Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1CA46509 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82973 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2011 19:09:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82899 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2011 19:09:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82416 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2011 19:09:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:09:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of apache@robweir.com designates 69.89.21.11 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.89.21.11] (HELO oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com) (69.89.21.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 19:09:42 +0000 Received: (qmail 22077 invoked by uid 0); 2 Aug 2011 19:09:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host181.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.181) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 2 Aug 2011 19:09:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=robweir.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version; bh=uaD+oRY6Gj0d7oLL+jL02IeCXdqhN5+iMoStAXkrDZ4=; b=oCO5pZ/Aq3dlml0wBuGUGbKdDNDivKhjhv3j4av3k8IpvWQ3178iHnyir1DvdytPWddc5alWajNUPHsppPRkLWuJ+wsCYiz+UsE59i9ar56c92KYXiatREIeQKFkwyRQ; Received: from mail-gw0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]) by host181.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QoKLA-0005gF-Lb for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:09:20 -0600 Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so62085gwb.6 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:09:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.172.12 with SMTP id z12mr2212337ano.142.1312312159555; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.20.2 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 12:09:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E38418C.3070104@the-martin-byrd.net> References: <008a01cc4ee7$ca79e5e0$5f6db1a0$@acm.org> <4E372589.9050100@gmail.com> <4E3745A4.1050404@ellisons.org.uk> <1312247462.2068.46.camel@jean-laptop15> <1312252687.2068.81.camel@jean-laptop15> <4E37F50B.1040405@ellisons.org.uk> <4E380C1F.20509@ellisons.org.uk> <4E382162.4070003@the-martin-byrd.net> <4E38387E.7010108@the-martin-byrd.net> <7C969586-8429-4A26-9AD2-39AEF92FBDC5@comcast.net> <4E38418C.3070104@the-martin-byrd.net> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 15:09:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was re:OpenOffice.org branding) From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Identified-User: {1114:host181.hostmonster.com:robweirh:robweir.com} {sentby:smtp auth 74.125.83.47 authed with apache@robweir.com} X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Another aspect I'd love to see addressed in the proposal: What other roles exist in the wiki? I know about: - Users (which we say may be anyone, provided they identify themselves and agree to the license) - Admins, which as we know need to be committers But any other roles? Moderators? Any form of super users? How are these appointed/approved? How does the PPMC exercise oversight? -Rob On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Andy Brown wrote= : > Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> On Aug 2, 2011, at 10:48 AM, Andy Brown wrote: >> >>> I work on this and see what I can come up with. =C2=A0I am no expert on= this >>> so it will be a very rough draft, but something that I fell we will nee= d to >>> do. =C2=A0We are much different that the "normal" Apache project so hop= efully be >>> granted some working room. =C2=A0I will start a new thread as this one = is getting >>> to deep to manage. >> >> Please put the word [PROPOSAL] in the subject. >> >> I think it should be in the context of openoffice.org site issues as >> opposed to apache.org issues, I think that may be the best dividing line= for >> the boundary for this "working room". > > Thanks for the idea, I will go that way. > >>> I am only trying to help all of us to keep a great product where it >>> belongs. >> >> By trying you succeed. > > Thanks. >