Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of apache@robweir.com designates
 66.147.249.253 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E480F53.80209@the-martin-byrd.net>
References: 
 <CAP-ksoiPzCqrs2CmSgxvCD1Pz7bFmq04Fueh-WAFBnY4No1UKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4ffp8G85LW=x9Y++awcrW6TQti2O8goGEJf=367ZH=qxqkSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<8151058839370557907@unknownmsgid>
	<CAA4ffp-+0-bh=zdvGrrkqy4TNcrv2+zUsCscmnh1PXT-=6PTsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<133e716559f67b121374d6f83d310257@tutopia.com>
	<1313324798.30865.16.camel@sybil-gnome>
	<CAP-ksoj50X_dt=30QTtoa=eEPaDcEBZ+RL1ZMgd+sc0k3w6i5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E47CE41.1010306@hdsnet.hu>
	<1313330254.30865.31.camel@sybil-gnome>
	<CAP-ksoj50dJ7HSTUiZ5XJ4B-Sp3EK5gvTQ-TDuk9kSpUs-UboA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110814151148.GC3585@ulungele.erack.de>
	<1313338531.30865.47.camel@sybil-gnome>
	<CAP-ksogo2iR6LxufKqJh7u+LRbPotw6RhO5=Zq6qMLYS8g3aKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1313341570.30865.57.camel@sybil-gnome>
	<CAP-ksohsDuw0La9LPAsa2FkjounJ-r_Cp0ddFk126LdaqpvrTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E480AE6.90704@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<CAP-ksohm2hzt6CANSuoPEj9uOXX2VdTs75vHfasLFhSOrCO9Pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E480F53.80209@the-martin-byrd.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:30:44 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAP-ksohh6iHY8zS3o-71NrNks31sMNpDSTx33bT6esk2iP4EXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [www] Ext / Temp repository stability ( was Extensions and
 templates site down )
From: Rob Weir <apache@robweir.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Andy Brown <andy@the-martin-byrd.net> wrot=
e:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andy Brown<andy@the-martin-byrd.net>
>> =C2=A0wrote:
>>>
>>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:06 PM, drew<drew@baseanswers.com> =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [from out of left field]
>>>>> Would members consider transferring ownership of the current reposito=
ry
>>>>> hosted on the OSUOSL server to a third party, perhaps created
>>>>> specifically to take this over, and then working with them to create
>>>>> the
>>>>> indirect reference site under the AOO project, filtering out
>>>>> un-acceptably licensed items as a way to achieving option #2. This
>>>>> would
>>>>> move the entire repository without needing to locate individual
>>>>> authors.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't see how we can claim ownership of the content on the OSUOSL
>>>> server. =C2=A0It was not part of the Oracle SGA, as far as I know. =C2=
=A0So it
>>>> is not ours to give to a 3rd party.
>>>
>>> Considering the fact that the URLs are part of service.openoffice.org a=
nd
>>> AOOo will be getting the domains as part of the SGA, then it would seem
>>> that
>>> we own them, at least the name. =C2=A0So the domain could be hosted any=
 where
>>> that the PPMC see fit, even at OSUOSL.
>>>
>>
>> That logic doesn't follow. =C2=A0Hypothetically there could be legacy
>> OpenOffice.org URL's that contain Lady Gaga rips. =C2=A0That doesn't mea=
n
>> we have ownership of the music.
>>
>> We own the URL. =C2=A0We control what the URL points to. =C2=A0But that =
doesn't
>> mean we own what the URL points to.
>>
>
> Please read all that I wrote, "at least the name. =C2=A0So the domain cou=
ld be
> hosted any where that the PPMC see fit." =C2=A0I agree that we may not ow=
n the
> content but if a 3rd party wished to host them the PPMC could give its
> consent to do so and have the URLs point to that IP address.
>

OK. Sorry.  It sounds like we have a similar understanding then.  Our
consent is not needed for them to host the extensions, but only for us
to point (or redirect) our URL to their site.


> Andy
>