Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6FA07EA2 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68992 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2011 21:27:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68917 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2011 21:27:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68909 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2011 21:27:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:27:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,LOTS_OF_MONEY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wolf.halton@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:27:30 +0000 Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so4172133fxg.6 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sS1J6HAeE64mULnqrf3B3FN5/zL4+blGlMYoMV+3b5I=; b=gIQ92ujX0XLO/WYuuow7dsWSk7JCdxYoX6rBsGVaqfGhxsuEa7WuckZGX8nyjAQyI6 7EB3V9X42hsZHMe1+B4f5/6gbWR31awJx6KHUWub1Tj8yVn7R8Eqo/Dy+6ShKAm+c7mA YykBx50EKZ4JC6uSTqy0RkmzRQliZkeVGk4sg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.144.136 with SMTP id z8mr6061566fau.31.1313443629700; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.113.141 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:27:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110815095534.GA25555@daniel3.local> References: <20110813184551.GA31794@ulungele.erack.de> <4E4764C9.5080206@gmx.ch> <20110815012031.GB20033@daniel3.local> <20110815090530.GA23926@daniel3.local> <20110815095534.GA25555@daniel3.local> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:27:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fundraising From: Wolf Halton To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I am not a lawyer, but I have watched people play lawyers in tv shows. :-) I have been involved with church groups who handled their finances this way, but I cannot give legal advice to set it up. We may have an attorney or 2 on the list here, and I was hoping one might pipe up. On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf wro= te: > Would a for-profit be able to retain Section 8 in the license? > > Wolf Halton wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:35:57 -0400: >> One way th handle the issue is to have both a non-profit and a for-profi= t >> arm to an organization. =C2=A0The NGO foundation side handling education= and >> development issues and the for-profit side handling everything else. >> Plainly, this might not be a viable option to us for half a dozen reason= s; >> from a perceived dilution of the "brand," to alienating developers. =C2= =A0It >> would work in a sense just like any other for-profit company offering >> support for an NGO, but would have the added benefit of making it easier= for >> other companies to help, as they could hand money over to the for-profit >> Apache Inc in an extremely straightforward manner - payment, not donatio= n. >> This makes it no harder to get a tax break on the moneys so offered, as >> "professional services" is still a deductible expense, just as "donation= s" >> are (in some cases). >> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Daniel Shahaf w= rote: >> >> > I don't have any specific comment on this; you might talk to fundraisi= ng@. >> > >> > Ian Lynch wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:52:40 +0100: >> > > On 15 August 2011 02:20, Daniel Shahaf wrot= e: >> > > >> > > > Raphael Bircher wrote on Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 08:01:45 +0200: >> > > > >> > > > > I assume that a donnation to the ASF is only tax-free in the US. >> > > > > Every Country has here there oven criteria. That's the reason wh= y >> > > > > Wikipedia has NGO's in each Country. It means, donnation to the = ASF >> > > > > will not be Tax-Free in Switzerland. >> > > > >> > > > I'm aware of one case of an entity incorporated in Europe having w= anted >> > > > to donate to the ASF but faced tax issues in the process. =C2=A0Th= ey ended >> > up >> > > > supporting the project in other ways. >> > > > >> > > > BTW: I don't see ASF having NGO's in each country. =C2=A0Having on= e NGO is >> > > > enough overhead... >> > > > >> > > >> > > In the UK you have to be a registered Charity with a board of truste= es to >> > > get tax relief on donations. Setting up a charity is much more invol= ved >> > than >> > > setting up a company. Many non-profit companies are either CICs or >> > companies >> > > limited by guarantee rather than limited companies with shareholders= . One >> > > reason why we are a straight limited company is that unless we were = a >> > > charity there really isn't much advantage. >> > > >> > > One other method of getting resource into the projects is through EU >> > grants. >> > > Over the last 2 years I have written 3 successful applications with = a >> > grant >> > > value of about 800,000 Euros. =C2=A0Unfortunately, the recent OpenOf= fice.org >> > > application failed, but that was on a legal technicality because the >> > > submitting organisation in Germany was not the right type of legal e= ntity >> > > :-( The application was deemed to be good enough. So I propose that = we >> > put >> > > in at least 2 versions of this through 2 different teams to differen= t >> > > National Agencies. One for Apache OOo and one for LibO. Since the >> > > application is based on certification of end users we could "clone" = this >> > > application further eg to other Apache projects that could benefit f= rom >> > > skills certification or more generally other FOSS projects such as >> > Inkscape, >> > > GIMP, Audacity etc. If anyone has any suggestions for Apache project= s >> > that >> > > could be candidates, or better still interest in running such a proj= ect >> > > please speak up. You need to be able to apply through a legal compan= y or >> > > public sector body in an EU country. We can get grant funding to mee= t and >> > > plan and I will provide whatever support is necessary. I can find >> > partners >> > > in a range of EU countries. >> > > >> > > We can apply for these grants each year (unless the EU changes the >> > system). >> > > If we can use these to get viable certification programmes for FOSS >> > going, >> > > that can then generate further income in perpetuity. It's low risk >> > because >> > > the grants are not money that has to be repaid but it is in our (FOS= S) >> > > interest to set up a sustainable business so that we are not depende= nt on >> > > them in the future. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Ian >> > > >> > > Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ) >> > > >> > > www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 >> > > >> > > The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, >> > > Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and >> > > Wales. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com > --=20 This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com