Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A20F17CA4 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74852 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2011 18:00:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74788 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2011 18:00:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74778 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2011 18:00:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:00:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kay.schenk@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.173] (HELO mail-ey0-f173.google.com) (209.85.215.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:00:13 +0000 Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so428769eyb.18 for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:59:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AAfWoRcpziFz/h+UofF2y47Q7Cm2liVmQL04Vteojio=; b=uval/1qJsTf2Vb8xGjtyPXyY2dzLc7+Rl9UZadwEMkPChlA+R5k8XirSLG2F7FRLQE GvaE6cUoEm8hioNEnKKaazwT+k/AnhlJTWb39iXDyoBTP2v2U0CbVn0A2VXaQcRsjYtJ PiVmWVvW91qNjb12O0vDpJQc2yKLl1CN7TmO8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.4.134 with SMTP id 6mr362661ebr.148.1312394391710; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.25.134 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 10:59:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E39693C.5000907@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 10:59:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: status of OpenOffice logo? From: Kay Schenk To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c171285eda004a99da10f --0015174c171285eda004a99da10f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > There are some first steps proceding with moving portions of the existng > > OpenOffice.org site to Apache. See, for example, > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/download/index.html > > > > This page lacks headers and footers, which brings me to... > > > > I know there's been discussion about the current OpenOffice.org logo > > > > vis a vis trademarks, possible changes due to Apache etc. > > > > But could someone give us an update on this? > > > > Can we use the existing logo without changes (i.e. ref to Apache?) or ??? > > > > Use the logo where? > Rob et al-- On the pages that are currently being migrated/created -- the link I sent above is essentially the current OO.o download page without headers/ footers. > > > There seems to be few Apache projects. e.g Buildr, which don't seem to > use > > the Apache logo, and since there seems to be a consensus to keep > > OpenOffice.org at a site openoffice.org, I'm wondering if we can just > > proceed with what we ahve in terms of headers for web pages without > change. > > > > Which headers and footers? The ones at OO.o that have the Oracle and > the Project Kenai logos and have the statement "Oracle and Java are > registered trademarks of Oracle and/or its affiliates"? I don't > think we will want to keep that page footer unchanged. > yes, right--of course we would exclude these references. > > I think the way to think of this is: > > 1) Oracle owns the trademark in the name "OpenOffice.org" and in the > graphical logo. This trademark is registered in several countries. > > 2) Oracle has stated that they will assign these trademarks to Apache. > This involves paperwork in multiple countries and will take time. > Andrew Rist is the best one to give an update on where they are in > that process. > ah, OK. Thanks. > > 3) Once transferred to Apache then we can use the logo per Apache > Branding Requirements: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html > > 4) If we want to create a different version of that logo (if that is > what you are asking about) then this is really two questions: > > a) Do we have the right to modify the logo? I think that would be > yes. We can create derived works if we own the copyright to the logo. > > b) What is the status of the modified logo? I have no idea what that > does in terms of trademark. In particular, would it mean we need to > register the modified logo? If this comes up as a direction we want > to take, we'd need to consult with Apache Branding on this. > OK, and thanks for your response. > > Regards, > > -Rob > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > MzK > > > > "If you can keep your head when all others around you > > are losing theirs - maybe you don't fully understand > > the situation!" > > -- Unknown > > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "If you can keep your head when all others around you are losing theirs - maybe you don't fully understand the situation!" -- Unknown --0015174c171285eda004a99da10f--