Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ma.reiter@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksoi+GLAiSCD_9w9-8DEvEzHYPHVQXou2O7r7WVy2gLuAig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <008a01cc4ee7$ca79e5e0$5f6db1a0$@acm.org>
	<4E372589.9050100@gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksogwik=HGE11bPK6AKt6HsGfWap2QRcV3Gz0NEzZ94Uexw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E3745A4.1050404@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksoj2_9ZHoLAhzawtMcQkbk2ZQhYBYqavv3NOymmhkYG88A@mail.gmail.com>
	<1312247462.2068.46.camel@jean-laptop15>
	<CAP-ksoiZu_9-a10x-0jM0dYSvpfA83WbX1C-dehNPwk=gLXBGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1312252687.2068.81.camel@jean-laptop15>
	<CAP-ksohAgF5m0jtpN6sj5QaSsfOTvVeZ2dnTO1zsZYAWW_DwCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOVv=gOaDdRExnR9HKDeoHz6=BzbkZPt7BzcewFmfRY=dDRjRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E37F50B.1040405@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksohNZFBRdrSVw+kE67JksCD_5_9h80sOX+gfer4-4+rNwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E380C1F.20509@ellisons.org.uk>
	<CAP-ksojnUTo71Fmks4LbJ8+LhZgStGgRsxgkRhBWAPrLPPTAfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E382162.4070003@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<4E38387E.7010108@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<7C969586-8429-4A26-9AD2-39AEF92FBDC5@comcast.net>
	<4E38418C.3070104@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<CAP-ksoiJLxPJdMYxUmJnirU3Mv9SmM-3i_nmrhZexS5cJ8sm1g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E384F4A.20100@the-martin-byrd.net>
	<CAP-ksogARZZqti4WTiQN5m687w5eVU4E0naCHErtV5iCoo0r6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEsUX0LpW-Wj=ueeiYqVsj3V7ghoHeEAKpMcd7j9p0TFbkBseA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP-ksoi+GLAiSCD_9w9-8DEvEzHYPHVQXou2O7r7WVy2gLuAig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:39:37 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAEsUX0K0pn8xNXZ+LRSL3+D-W7aG1GRC+Y4se8gAkbv8cePC9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was
 re:OpenOffice.org branding)
From: "Manfred A. Reiter" <ma.reiter@gmail.com>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2011/8/3 Rob Weir <apache@robweir.com>
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Manfred A. Reiter <ma.reiter@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> > 2011/8/2 Rob Weir <apache@robweir.com>
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Andy Brown <andy@the-martin-byrd.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> I poked around and found this page:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
> >>
> >> This lists some additional roles (with counts)
> >>
> >> Administrators (26)
> >> Bureaucrats (4)
> >> Editors (20)
> >> Reviewers (5)
> >>
> >> Those are in addition to 35,020 User accounts.
> >>
> >> Curiously, it reports only 5 of the 35,020 users as having been active
> >> in the past 7 days.
> >>
> >
> > did you poked around 1 year ago as well?
> > do you have an explanation, why these numbers are slowing down?
> >
> > with the statistic above you don't increase the credibility ...
> >
> > or
> >
> > http://www.statistik.baden-wuerttemberg.de/Veroeffentl/Monatshefte/essa=
y.asp?xYear=3D2004&xMonth=3D11&eNr=3D11
> >

1. did you read the first sentence in the link above?
more or less - Churchill: "I only belive in statistics, which I have
mainpulated myself."
or "the only=A0statistics=A0you can trust are those you falsified yourself"


> One of the biggest mistakes I made when I moved into my house was to ...
... [fairy-tail deleted]

>
> With the wiki, if we really want to allow anyone to have write access
> to it, then we really need to be committed to fight the weeds, which
> in the case of wikis would be spam, low quality content, edit wars,
> etc. =A0If we can re-establish the community participation level the way
> it was a year ago, then great. =A0It would have a chance of success.
> But right now I see almost no activity on the wiki. =A035,000 user
> accounts, but no users. =A0If this doesn't change, the weeds will surely
> win.
>

2. May be, my english is not good enough to understand, wheather your
your response answers my questions.

M.