Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D93674C9 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 10:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23808 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2011 10:09:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23472 invoked by uid 500); 5 Aug 2011 10:09:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23408 invoked by uid 99); 5 Aug 2011 10:09:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:09:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [94.136.40.64] (HELO mailex.mailcore.me) (94.136.40.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:09:10 +0000 Received: from host86-129-247-134.range86-129.btcentralplus.com ([86.129.247.134] helo=[192.168.1.69]) by mail6.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QpHKe-0006Yt-Lr for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:08:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4E3BC12F.5030104@ellisons.org.uk> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:08:47 +0100 From: Terry Ellison User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Migrating the web forums at user.services.openoffice.org to Apache servers References: <1312493077.14978.41.camel@sybil-gnome> <384CBB98-34A8-4566-BE35-CF2A487B8A3B@openoffice.org> In-Reply-To: <384CBB98-34A8-4566-BE35-CF2A487B8A3B@openoffice.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060806050802060602000005" X-Mailcore-Auth: 8445677 X-Mailcore-Domain: 884398 --------------060806050802060602000005 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/08/11 08:10, eric b wrote: > > Le 5 août 11 à 03:12, Pedro Giffuni a écrit : > >> Yes, it will continue to be inclusive for all OpenOffice derivatives. > > > So I'm still wondering why OOo4Kids and OOoLight are yet not listed ... > > Eric, The short answer is no once has asked or the demand isn't there -- yet. The long answer is slightly more complex: Historically and (possibly with some tweaks) going forward, the people who make the policy decision on the forums are the people who contribute to them. In a 100% community run effort, IFAIK, this is the only formula that will work. We have four of user -- remembering we run 9 national language (NL) forums which are largely separate communities. * per NL forum -- admins (that is within the phpBB application, not on the underlying system), though I do all of the admin for most forums, since there is a big learning curve here but in terms of transactions the load is featherweight. * per NL forum -- moderators who do the active moderation * big contributors -- We call these Community Volunteers or just Volunteers for short. * lastly we have an aggregate in the EN for called NL Adminstrators whice every NL admin and moderator is invited to join. On the EN forum we run two closed sub-forums: one "EN - Forum Issues " for discussing policy issues, and one "Site - Forum Administration " for wider admin issues. We do this in English, but members opinions are weighted if they are representing an NL consensus (e.g. our committers Zoltán Reizinger and Kazunari Hirano represent the HU and JA communities). Sorry BTW if you try to access these, but they are closed so that we can be more frank amongst ourselves in discussion. Each other NL forum has a closed Forum Issues forum to manage its business. Policy issues are discussed here and it is the consensus here that sets policy. So for example we had a long debate on whether to support LibreOffice when the Oracle view seemed to us to be hostile to this. Our strong consensus was that in reality there is one OOo community, and so it made sense to do so. The issue about supporting any specific product, however, is that you need enough active volunteers with knowledge of the specific flavour to credibly offer support. I don't think we've reached that threshold for OOo4Kids and OOoLight yet. Terry --------------060806050802060602000005--