Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 331C881E5 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85872 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2011 16:55:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85739 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2011 16:55:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 85724 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2011 16:55:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:55:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.28] (HELO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:55:14 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003402222B; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:54:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:54:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=ociUq+3qEOS9ttphshiZ9SOUULc=; b=ZxiOw2gMMPRBcd0mykP2AJANIcDT Kw58qDg5OucGMwbt14GAFN4dXv27HCPW3Xe52Ppc5LHUcFkMAIeLdcHWaUZ/OzZH GfHw9Z3Wx8UtFt0ICIrb8QnwDALOcwxv36T0kri4ousPHJ4ZJj8No8ylWeGYat6Z mfFFPRNd3bex2cA= X-Sasl-enc: By8qOqB1NAini0kPVP3Nhm25218FWWAYLCQDlpxttcgxKsBWiE+HoyreAl7Obw 1313513693 Received: from daniel3.local (bzq-79-176-200-250.red.bezeqint.net [79.176.200.250]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BD8A45FA90; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:54:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:54:39 +0300 From: Daniel Shahaf To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Repo][Proposal] OOO340 SVN Dump file import Message-ID: <20110816165439.GA10823@daniel3.local> References: <4E4A104D.8090905@gmx.net> <20110816124813.GA23676@daniel3.local> <1313507919.87657.YahooMailNeo@web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <20110816154430.GA6529@daniel3.local> <4bd76f18838bd9401bf62c98c4c532e0@tutopia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4bd76f18838bd9401bf62c98c4c532e0@tutopia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Pedro Giffuni wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:27:47 -0500: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:44:30 +0300, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > ... > >> > >>Perhaps I am missing something, but couldn't you just go ahead > >>and commit it directly in the server? > > > >No, the two copies Rob mentioned are the dump and the repository, but > >you could > > > >curl | gzip -dc | svnadmin load > > > >to avoid one of them. > > I meant that, given that we are not preserving any history a dump seems > overhead. Instead of having people downloading dumps, setting up their > own repositories and presumably have infra@ load it afterwards, we > should just commit it (assuming initial issues were fixed). > Don't commit a 350MB commit without talking to infra first, so as to avoid having the EU mirror be behind HEAD for too long, thanks.