Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-3990-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E10917409
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:17:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 788 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2011 00:17:14 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 741 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2011 00:17:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 730 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2011 00:17:13 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:17:13 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [205.178.146.58] (HELO omr8.networksolutionsemail.com)
 (205.178.146.58)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:17:05 +0000
Received: from cm-omr4 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50])
	by omr8.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
 p7O0GhYW013343
	for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:16:44 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr4 smtp.user=drew@baseanswers.com;
 auth=pass (LOGIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: drew@baseanswers.com
Received: from [174.140.78.93] ([174.140.78.93:37231] helo=[192.168.1.3])
	by cm-omr4 (envelope-from <drew@baseanswers.com>)
	(ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA
	id 69/C9-16414-BE2445E4; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:16:43 -0400
Subject: RE: Bugzilla vs JIRA (was: <id>@openoffice.org)
From: drew <drew@baseanswers.com>
To: gavin@16degrees.com.au
Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, dennis.hamilton@acm.org
In-Reply-To: <08ae01cc61f1$ebef6890$c3ce39b0$@16degrees.com.au>
References: <4E514114.2010100@the-martin-byrd.net>
	 <4E528B13.4010103@gmx.net>
	 <CAP-ksojz-eEo+uz7VHBMgiNHcY7ibm9H05hDytWmMAJo8MX=aw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4E52938D.7080708@gmx.net> <00d701cc60fa$a11ee9f0$e35cbdd0$@acm.org>
	 <4E52A640.7010503@cfl.rr.com> <4E52AE9B.2050303@the-martin-byrd.net>
	 <4E52AFD6.80503@cfl.rr.com>
	 <CAP-ksohR-O1=3vp-ACp2ac0heEaVWpwHmEYSXtTn=FKBDXRTuA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20110823142259.GD23171@kulungile.erack.de>
	 <014401cc61cd$ddccfad0$9966f070$@acm.org>
	 <08ae01cc61f1$ebef6890$c3ce39b0$@16degrees.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:16:49 -0400
Message-ID: <1314145009.9846.53.camel@sybil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 10:08 +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 5:50 AM
> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Bugzilla vs JIRA (was: <id>@openoffice.org)
> > 
> > I personally prefer JIRA, but it was the first one where I saw issue tracking
> > work well in a group setting.
> > 
> > I don't like bugzilla that much.
> > 
> > I think bugzilla is the answer here because the e-mail addresses of the
> > existing reports have hard-coded e-mail address in them.
> > 
> > There are some other issues though.  What Apache has is a single big JIRA
> > and, AFAIK, a single big bugzilla, just like it has a single big SVN.  How we
> > migrate into either one of those is a puzzle.
> 
> no puzzle, we are going to migrate the Bugzilla as it is, into a separate instance.
> Once migrated and working, then , over time, we look at what is best, be it make
> it more standard and merge it in, or we move to Jira, whatever, priority is to migrate
> it as it is, that is the plan and is being worked on.

Excellent.