Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D54BD71F4 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 01:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9672 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2011 01:46:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9429 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2011 01:46:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 9413 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2011 01:46:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 01:46:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jeanweber@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 01:46:07 +0000 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so1240292gxk.6 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:45:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xmsuJb5beBImZM6dlbXUALqE/7YUym6Vx4j85n3zIDs=; b=tfoitYETBcoWGalRo9k0/B6bujfc/XVlalQc3DuNEFXbv+VDJx5pdLGe29uzFCSGFS wJXg+ykvNhb9JxiaEerf8rGEHV9MAKFBUUCRD9ewiP5+4Jr9S25S2JY6se5jLEW5p9J0 Yq6aW76gY4GZ+g7p7rEO0Aw9F8Td+iylW2F74= Received: by 10.236.191.2 with SMTP id f2mr8145646yhn.233.1313286346028; Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (203-214-86-197.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.214.86.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b24sm5552670yhm.39.2011.08.13.18.45.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 13 Aug 2011 18:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: Fundraising From: Jean Hollis Weber To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <043101cc5a1f$f2f39f00$d8dadd00$@16degrees.com.au> References: <20110813184551.GA31794@ulungele.erack.de> <4E471557.4070903@the-martin-byrd.net> <1313282659.3558.92.camel@jean-laptop15> <043101cc5a1f$f2f39f00$d8dadd00$@16degrees.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:45:38 +1000 Message-ID: <1313286338.3558.100.camel@jean-laptop15> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:17 +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jean Hollis Weber [mailto:jeanweber@gmail.com] > > Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 10:44 AM > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Fundraising > > > > > > > Profits from sales of printed copies of ODFAuthors (formerly OOoAuthors) > > books are held by the not-for-profit organisation[1] that publishes those > > books. The money from OpenOffice.org user guide sales is designated to "be > > used to benefit the community". This could include things like costs of > > conference attendance, > > Did you have any community members apply to go this year's ApacheCon; > and were they accepted? > > If any AOOo community folks applied for Apache Travel Assistance funds to > go to ApacheCon this year, should we have refused and sent them to you > instead and should we continue this segregation in the future? Shall all the > committers and community members all able to apply to the ASF for > Apache Travel Assistance with the sole exception of the AOOo community > and committers, because the funds will be covered as you mentioned by > the friendsofopendocument.org ? That is not what I said, suggested, or implied. You are either misreading or being deliberately provocative; from your tone, I suspect the latter. Why? I said funds *could be* used for purposes like those examples I gave. I made no suggestion that these funds *should be* used in place of any money available from Apache or elsewhere, and certainly not that they *would be* so used... just that they existed and *could be* used in ways that benefit the community. Also, I made no reference to ApacheCon nor mentioned any specific conference. I was thinking, in fact, of people who attend conferences for librarians or technical writers or educators (as examples) to promote (Apache) OpenOffice.org -- more of a marketing function. --Jean > > > Thanks > > Gav... > > > > copies of books for display at conferences, copies of > > books (including translations) for distribution where cost is an issue for the > > recipient, possibly payment to writers of docs on specific topics... and other > > things I haven't thought of while writing this note. > > > > As Simon suggests, any such disbursement of funds is between us and the > > recipient, as the money does not go to or through any OpenOffice.org > > account, assuming such a thing exists. > > > > [1] Friends of OpenDocument, Inc., http://friendsofopendocument.org/ > > > > --Jean > >