Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57618FEE for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77810 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2011 15:33:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77754 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2011 15:33:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77746 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2011 15:33:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:33:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org designates 75.98.160.130 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.98.160.130] (HELO a2s15.a2hosting.com) (75.98.160.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:33:45 +0000 Received: from 63-226-210-225.tukw.qwest.net ([63.226.210.225] helo=Astraendo) by a2s15.a2hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qrtjg-00029R-R8 for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:33:25 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: References: <7DE220F2-5AFE-4A01-AEEC-58CF1CA9F379@webmink.com> <003501cc5886$55214f10$ff63ed30$@acm.org> <4E452798.8060503@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Making mailing lists useful (was Re: [Proposal]) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 08:34:09 -0700 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <006201cc5905$48a34570$d9e9d050$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQOd8yp80yzg48lC+0HHDnnQkHEL/wJXtSDYAVEsiQ8CNtqqSgGpBrQiAS/UYf4BcYvlegJquciuAve3XRMBwoS9zQGIufdcAiv/yIEBsHcBHAEABqSUAUuZ4l6QriRBUA== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s15.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -1 Hey, a terrific blow for community there, Rob! Please don't ever do that again for a matter under active discussion. = Not ever. I urge you to revert those changes. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Rob Weir [mailto:apache@robweir.com]=20 Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 07:57 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Making mailing lists useful (was Re: [Proposal]) On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:31 AM, N=C3=B3ir=C3=ADn Plunkett = wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> The range of contributors to the website is identical to the range of >> contributors to the wiki. The only difference is in the wiki case >> they need to take the additional step to sign up for an account on = the >> wiki. In other case they merely submit a patch to the mailing list >> they are already subscribed to. So in terms of effort, the patch >> route is simpler for the contributor. > > I'm not sure on what basis you make any of those assertions; I > certainly disagree. > > There's a qualitative difference between submitting a patch that > someone else has to apply, and having the power to make a change > without having to wait for someone else to get to their mail and say > it's ok. > > And, while you could argue either way as to how big the difference is > for a single patch, once you get into multiple patches, it seems clear > to me that the wiki route is simpler for the contributor. > Well, after a couple days of discussion, I've seen no one step up and make these simple additions to the wiki. So whatever "power" the wiki has, it seems hypothetical at this point. I've gone ahead and made the simple addition to the web site. The power of CMS is reaffirmed: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/mailing-lists.html If someone eventually does decide that it is worth their time to add a treatment of this topic to the wiki, I'd be happy to add a link to it from that web page, per Simon's suggestion. But I still think this works far better as a folksonomy rather than a curated taxonomy. Whether it is done on the website or the wiki is really not very important. But I think that attempts to enforce a a designed taxonomy will be futile. Better to set general guidelines, which is what I've done on the website. -Rob > N >