incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <apa...@robweir.com>
Subject Re: [Repo][Proposal] OOO340 SVN Dump file import
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:49:50 GMT
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Ingrid von der Mehden
<IngridvdM@gmx-topmail.de> wrote:
> Am 16.08.2011 19:04, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ingrid von der Mehden
>> <IngridvdM@gmx-topmail.de>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 16.08.2011 16:21, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Ingrid von der Mehden
>>>> <IngridvdM@gmx-topmail.de>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 15.08.2011 18:46, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ooo/trunk/core --- all the OOO340 stuff
>>>>>> ooo/trunk/l10n -- all the language stuff
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually I would suggest to name the directory 'main' instead of
>>>>> 'core'.
>>>>> The term 'core' is used already in several modules within the OOo
>>>>> source
>>>>> code, where it does imply that this is something without user interface
>>>>> (more the model part in MVC pattern). So using the term 'core' for the
>>>>> whole
>>>>> office (including user interface) is misleading and could create
>>>>> confusion.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note what we already have in SVN:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/
>>>>
>>>> We're mixing site files, and source in the same repository.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if we want a "src" directory that is a sibling of "site".
>>>> And then "main" and "extras" under that?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I just searched through the different Apache projects and the scheme as
>>> we
>>> have it is quite common:
>>>
>>> 'Apache Project'/site
>>> 'Apache Project'/trunk
>>> 'Apache Project'/branches
>>> 'Apache Project'/tags
>>>
>>> Those directories can be found very often. I think it is not too bad to
>>> stay
>>> with the common scheme. This makes it easier to switch between projects
>>> for
>>> all Apache committers.
>>>
>>> ------
>>>
>>> If we instead choose to have a src directory next to site, I would vote
>>> to
>>> put trunk, branches and tags into it. All the different code lines are
>>> all
>>> src, they belong together. So we would have:
>>>
>>> ooo/site
>>> ooo/src/trunk/main
>>> ooo/src/trunk/extras
>>> ooo/src/branches
>>> ooo/src/tags
>>>
>>> This will lead to an additional directory in the path. But the logical
>>> grouping is cleaner. A pitfall might be that some people might expect
>>> only
>>> source code in a directory called src and not things like help content or
>>> translation.
>>>
>>> So I still prefer:
>>> ooo/trunk/main --- all the OOO340 stuff
>>> ooo/trunk/extras/l10n -- all the language stuff
>>>
>>
>> OK.  I'll do that for the the next run.  This will be Linux, with your
>> directory structure.   Should be ready in 3 hours or so.
>>
>
> Cool, thanks a lot!
> My svn repository from the previous dump file is still in load process, so I
> haven't seen the concrete structure in l10n so far.
> Is there a directory duplication l10n/l10n?
>

I don't think so.  In the new version I'm dumping right now we have:

ooo/trunk/extras/l10n

and then under there we have:

ooo/trunk/extras/l10n/prj
ooo/trunk/extras/l10n/source
ooo/trunk/extras/l10n/util


> I think it should be sufficient if we technically import the l10n repository
> directly into the extras directory. This should then lead to pathes like
> this:
> ooo/trunk/extras/l10n/source
> and not
> ooo/trunk/extras/l10n/l10n/source
>

Right.

> Kind regards,
> Ingrid
>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Ingrid
>>>
>>>>> I would also put the l10n stuff into a further directory. Those people
>>>>> who
>>>>> have no idea what l10n might be, could benefit from a simpler name
>>>>> 'extras'.
>>>>> This makes the first browsing experience in the source code less
>>>>> frightening.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I would suggest:
>>>>> ooo/trunk/main --- all the OOO340 stuff
>>>>> ooo/trunk/extras/l10n -- all the language stuff
>>>>>
>>>>> The full proposal was here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-dev/201108.mbox/%3C4E3D07B7.8080101@gmx-topmail.de%3E
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Ingrid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message