incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wolf Halton <wolf.hal...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: RE: [odftk-dev] Re: request help on ODF data signature issues
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:48:20 GMT
+1 default_mode=standards_compliant

On Aug 4, 2011 10:50 AM, "Hanssens Bart" <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be> wrote:
> Dare I mention "quirks mode" ? :-)
>
> In that case, I'd strongly suggest to make the standards mode the default,
> not the quirks mode (otherwise it's too easy to let this issue
proliferate)
>
> Bart
>
> ________________________________________
> From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [robert_weir@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 4:36 PM
> To: dev@odftoolkit.odftoolkit.org; ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [odftk-dev] Re: request help on ODF data signature issues
>
> So, from the ODF Toolkit perspective, I think it would be best if we had a
> flag that the programmer could set, to make it operate in "standards mode"
> or "hacks mode" or something like that. It is useful to have a "reference
> implementation" mode where it follows the standard strictly. This could
> be used for interop testing with other products. And it is also useful to
> have a mode that is compatible with current OOo/LO.
>
> -Rob
>
> Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be> wrote on 08/04/2011 05:39:32 AM:
>
>> From: Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>
>> To: "dev@odftoolkit.odftoolkit.org" <dev@odftoolkit.odftoolkit.org>,
>> "ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org" <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>> Date: 08/04/2011 05:40 AM
>> Subject: [odftk-dev] Re: request help on ODF data signature issues
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As far as I can tell, these are known implementation issues.
>> OOo (and most of the other products based on that code base) do not
>> follow the spec IMHO.
>>
>> See also
>>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39657 (ds namespace in
>> LibreOffice)
>> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107864 (ds namespace in
> OOo)
>> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66276 (multiple
>> X509Certificate in OOo)
>> http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108286
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Bart
>>
>> ----
>>
>> From: Biao Han [mailto:hanbiao@cn.ibm.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 4 augustus 2011 11:19
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: dev@odftoolkit.odftoolkit.org
>> Subject: [odftk-dev] request help on ODF data signature issues
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am the Apache ODF Toolkit developer and working on ODF data
>> signature feature. Several issues need to help.
>>
>> 1. Different from other xml file, such as content.xml, why
>> documentsignatures.xml is not namespace aware? For example,
>> "Signature" element, only the local name Signature, not including
>> "ds" namespace.
>> 2. Why Open Office generates three same content X509Certificate
>> elements for X509Data in documentsignatures.xml?
>> 3. How to generate XML ID datatype value? UDDI is too short...
>> OpenOffice
> ID_003a00a40036005c0099001b004900a400960062003000c500f900e300af00f7
>> UDDI ID_79200773-ec61-43d5-b079-a26a081bfb08
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>>
>> Biao Han (Devin)
>> SOA Standards Growth, Emerging Technology Institute(ETI), IBM China
>> Software Development Laboratory
>> Tel:(86-10)82450541
>> Email: hanbiao@cn.ibm.com
>> Address: 3/F Ring Building, No.28 Building, Zhong Guan Cun Software
>> Park, No. 8 Dong Bei Wang West Road, ShangDi, Haidian District,
>> Beijing, P.R.C.100193
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message