incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ingrid von der Mehden <>
Subject Re: [Repo][Proposal] OOO340 SVN Dump file import
Date Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:53:37 GMT
Am 19.08.2011 15:30, schrieb Mathias Bauer:
> On 19.08.2011 15:10, Ingrid von der Mehden wrote:
>> Directly after import is fine. There was consensus on that already. But
>> if we don't discuss the name change now, we need another couple of weeks
>> and the moment directly after import will have gone. So do you have
>> different names in mind?
> Nothing that sounds better. If we split up "extras" in the "main" repo,
> my main concern would be solved anyway, so I would be fine with "main"
> and "extras" in that case.

>> Good question regarding 'minimal' and 'regular'. I am not totally
>> decided. Is there a way to have both? For the day to day development I
>> think an easy and fast way to build a minimal office would be the
>> greater benefit. But that demand might clash with demands from QA side ...
>> From the build environment POV you definitely can have both, in case we
> taught "instsetoo_native" and "postprocess" that e.g. a build without
> help content, extras etc. is valid. Not a big deal, but someone has to
> do it.
Cool, that is an encouraging outlook.

> Our build system concept also had a different idea for how developers
> should work with OOo: the build already should have created a runnable
> instance of OOo, no packaging required. In that case you can build
> whatever you want, with extras or without, if it runs it is usable for
> developers.
Sounds good :-)

>>> The new build system is capable of
>>> working with several (sub-)repositories, the old one still needs the
>>> "source_config" crutch.
>> Yes, I now found for the new system there is the environment variable
>> gb_REPOS which takes the list of repos. Lets assume it contains the two
>> repos 'main' and 'extras'. What happens if the directory 'extras' is not
>> present? Does the build abort with error, or does it continue with
>> warning? Can we make it so that it does continue with a gentle note?
> As gbuild already has shown that it works without code changes with or
> without "l10n" repo, this is not a problem. I don't remember the
> details, but we can look that up when necessary.
Agreed, that is not so urgent at the moment. Thanks a lot anyhow.

Kind regards,

> Regards,
> Mathias

View raw message