incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From TerryE <...@ellisons.org.uk>
Subject Re: Refactoring the brand: Apache ooo + OpenOffice.org? (was re:OpenOffice.org branding)
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2011 01:24:13 GMT
On 02/08/11 23:28, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> With the wiki, if we really want to allow anyone to have write access
> to it, then we really need to be committed to fight the weeds, which
> in the case of wikis would be spam, low quality content, edit wars,
> etc.  If we can re-establish the community participation level the way
> it was a year ago, then great.  It would have a chance of success.
> But right now I see almost no activity on the wiki.  35,000 user
> accounts, but no users.  If this doesn't change, the weeds will surely
> win.
[terrye@doc logs]$ ls -hl

total 112635922

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Jan 12  2011 access.20110106.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Jan 19  2011 access.20110113.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Jan 26  2011 access.20110120.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Feb  2  2011 access.20110127.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.2G Feb  9 23:59 access.20110203.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Feb 16 23:59 access.20110210.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Feb 23 23:59 access.20110217.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Mar  2 23:59 access.20110224.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.1G Mar  9 23:59 access.20110303.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.0G Mar 16 23:59 access.20110310.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.0G Mar 23 23:59 access.20110317.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    2.0G Mar 30 23:59 access.20110324.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.9G Apr  6 23:59 access.20110331.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.9G Apr 13 23:59 access.20110407.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.8G Apr 20 23:59 access.20110414.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G Apr 27 23:59 access.20110421.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.8G May  4 23:59 access.20110428.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.8G May 11 23:59 access.20110505.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.7G May 18 23:59 access.20110512.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G May 25 23:59 access.20110519.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G Jun  1 23:59 access.20110526.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.5G Jun  8 23:59 access.20110602.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.5G Jun 15 23:59 access.20110609.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.6G Jun 22 23:59 access.20110616.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.4G Jun 29 23:59 access.20110623.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.3G Jul  6 23:59 access.20110630.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.4G Jul 13 23:59 access.20110707.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.3G Jul 20 23:59 access.20110714.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.4G Jul 27 23:59 access.20110721.log

-rw-r--r--   1 webservd webservd    1.1G Aug  3 03:14 access.20110728.log

We've discussed the update access reasons and issues previously.   As 
you can see from the Apache logs, the read volumes are still pretty high 
though they have fallen off by almost a factor of two since the Apache 
announcement.  Sorry, but I can't give you proper transaction volumes.  
Clayton had  o:rw access, not me.

Terry

Mime
View raw message