Return-Path: 
 <ooo-dev-return-2448-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B1C06A26
	for <apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:32:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 63029 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2011 03:32:30 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62790 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2011 03:32:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ooo-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <ooo-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62781 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2011 03:32:20 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:32:20 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wolf.halton@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:32:13 +0000
Received: by fxg7 with SMTP id 7so8187769fxg.7
        for <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=3u05OsaVkmDLS/7Qhe2lxbchI9xzn3EWdYmNQqrXTQI=;
        b=FmNbXw/V7bHiqo5+SDUlq9xq9NJ+dCJ7/8khkQKAqh/aPpowP3EjY11MSXiwFTu3AW
         MdU+CMTzT1Hgffkj10hG/6FFdhV76wC81pPCUQZmRvoP6hv2VEqN5jdlcpyXito4P5oY
         TXOkFXR7BLpIQ82N9FzcjpdayBuUISVgnnmuA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.32.67 with SMTP id b3mr3108712fad.25.1311391913613; Fri,
 22 Jul 2011 20:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.123.67 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.123.67 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <010801cc48af$8f1cfca0$ad56f5e0$@acm.org>
References: <018b01cc481c$e46a5600$ad3f0200$@apache.org>
	<BLU0-SMTP10302E6E8D3421D1EFC3026D94E0@phx.gbl>
	<010801cc48af$8f1cfca0$ad56f5e0$@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 23:31:53 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALRLYE=Qy6JLcK7RgCWskqV2=HnUwb_r7qurtj=fv-xmKo+QDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [DISCUSS] <Initial Committer>: Apache OpenOffice.org Initial
 Committer Status
From: Wolf Halton <wolf.halton@gmail.com>
To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org, ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747bc082c18dd04a8b43938
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--00151747bc082c18dd04a8b43938
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What is the technical or social stressor causing this issue to be framed in
this time-sensitive language?
Wolf

On Jul 22, 2011 4:40 PM, "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>
wrote:
> I did not include a time limit, because we had not agreed on one. Instead=
,
I made the request to indicate whether they intended to submit an iCLA and
how much time they would need (for whatever review reasons or other
determinations involved).
>
> These Initial Committers were already sent a bulk e-mail on June 23.
>
> Why would we not expect the Initial Committers who signed up by June 10 t=
o
report whether they intend to actually become committers? It is about their
commitment, it seems to me. And they always have the opportunity to become
committers by showing up and contributing, the same as for anyone who is no=
t
an Initial Committer.
>
> My thought was to wait 15-30 days after we approach all of them
individually and then send a follow-up to ones who have not responded at al=
l
indicating that the invitation to become committers and PPMC members is
being withdrawn. (Assuming we decide to do that and set such a date.)
>
> I would make the changes that Stephen Bergmann recommended.
>
> More feedback and discussion, please.
>
> - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan C. Sanz [mailto:juancsanzc@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:28
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] <Initial Committer>: Apache OpenOffice.org Initial
Committer Status
>
> El 22/07/2011 5:10, Dennis E. Hamilton escribi=C3=B3:
>> There are 20 Initial Committers on the OpenOffice.org incubator proposal
who have not yet submitted iCLAs or informed us of their intention not to d=
o
so.
>>
>> Today I used the following format for a message to one of those Initial
Committers.
>>
>> Before 19 more of these are sent out I wanted to check how understandabl=
e
this is.
>>
>> I am particularly concerned for how clear this is for those who are not
native English speakers.
>>
>> I welcome your advice.
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>> *** specimen message ***
>>
>> From:<PPMC member>
>> Sent:<today>
>> To:<Initial Committer lacking iCLA so far>
>> Cc: ooo-private@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject:<Initial Committer Name>: Apache OpenOffice.org Initial Committe=
r
Status
>>
>> Hello<Initial Committer Name>,
>>
>> You are listed as an Initial Committer on the proposal for the Apache
OpenOffice.org incubator project.
>>
>> The incubator project was accepted by Apache on 2011-06-13.
>>
>> As an Initial Committer you are invited to be established as a committer
on the Apache OpenOffice.org incubator podling. You are also invited to
serve on the Podling Project Management Committee after you are established
as a committer.
>>
>> The prerequisite to becoming established as a committer is to register a=
n
iCLA agreement with Apache.
>>
>> Our records indicate that no iCLA has been received from you.
>>
>> If you do not choose to submit an iCLA, please report your decision to<
ooo-private@incubator.apache.org>. We will then know not wait for it.
>>
>> If you are submitting an iCLA, please report your decision to
ooo-private@incubator.apache.org and indicate how much time you need before
the iCLA will be sent to Apache.
>>
>> For more information and iCLA/CCLA forms, go to<
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas>. Complete instructions for submission
of an iCLA is at the top of the form (text or PDF).
>>
>> We welcome your contribution to the Apache OpenOffice.org incubator
project.
>>
>> - the Apache OpenOffice.org incubator Podling Project Management
Committee (PPMC)
>>
>> *** end of specimen message ***
>>
> I think it's understundandable. But, what is the next step? how long do
> we wait for the user id?
> Regards.
> Juan C. Sanz
>

--00151747bc082c18dd04a8b43938--