Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42E2C60A8 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 21:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4274 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 21:46:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 4242 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 21:45:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 4234 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2011 21:45:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:45:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rgardler@opendirective.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:45:54 +0000 Received: by iym10 with SMTP id 10so5119845iym.6 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:45:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opendirective.com; s=opendirective; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fr9yD0QQ+YVj5cTYCJ2Zdo/oT378N085OMp4qupi52Y=; b=YwgLAiJsPpsDPXalcbBvew6qb2wP1IzE68xH/2XrQ5pwO6CBYU9SW5E+JXFMGHMq06 q5wIMEufx5ZaG/s/rkq/mRWmgMxtHvqvVBkxsDnpvedDYd1OWn4B360+VQTUwBOhi064 a69z2owMPL0IC8wjVN64r6pTWhB8ygB8tsKbU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.153.9 with SMTP id k9mr1441010icw.49.1309815932446; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.165.137 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 14:45:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [90.221.248.251] In-Reply-To: <01b401cc3a85$2d5c5930$88150b90$@acm.org> References: <20110701140009.4EE614991@minotaur.apache.org> <01b401cc3a85$2d5c5930$88150b90$@acm.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:45:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org) From: Ross Gardler To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, dennis.hamilton@acm.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4 July 2011 21:01, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > +1 on circulation on ooo-dev. > > I'm not sure which wiki you mean and whether that would limit participati= on or not. Sorry, I was referring to the wiki that is used to submit the report to the IPMC. It is publicly writable. Ross > > =A0- Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgardler@opendirective.com] > Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 03:06 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for July 2011 (ooo-dev@incubator.= apache.org) > > [ ... ] > > The most common practice that I am aware of is: > > - someone writes a draft and circulates via the dev list for comment > - after 72 hours or so comments are collated and it's put in the wiki > - mentors are asked to sign it off > > An alternative which also works well, is to do it directly in the wiki > and request changes be made directly. > > Ross > > [ ... ] > > --=20 Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com