Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of floeff@documentfoundation.org
 designates 178.63.91.70 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4E310D34.9060103@documentfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:18:12 +0200
From: Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>
Organization: The Document Foundation
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Population of ooo-security
References: <000f01cc4cc4$f5e29530$e1a7bf90$@apache.org>
 <CAP-ksogT0FTmLkPnOAi2tesMKEEA2jdw7=Qrv7OdD77c4nBwaw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAP-ksogT0FTmLkPnOAi2tesMKEEA2jdw7=Qrv7OdD77c4nBwaw@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=8C9A6155;
	url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x8C9A6155
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

Rob Weir wrote on 2011-07-28 04:08:
> -1.  This is the project's private security list, with only a subset
> of the PPMC on it.  We should not have 3rd parties signed up on it.

that would mark a negative change in the way things are handled. Since=20
the beginning of LibO, we have also been collaborating with the=20
OpenOffice.org folks on security and vice versa, and from what has been=20
discussed the last weeks on those private lists, I got the impression=20
that everyone involved wanted to keep that good spirit and cooperation,=20
as it has shown to be beneficial for both sides.

I second Andr=E9 and Drew in their opinion that this is actually one of=20
the areas, where cooperation is very easily possible, so IMHO, we=20
shouldn't waste that chance.

Florian

--=20
Florian Effenberger <floeff@documentfoundation.org>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff