Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E05F6B8E for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63921 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2011 23:11:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63811 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2011 23:11:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63801 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2011 23:11:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:11:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 213.209.103.15 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.209.103.15] (HELO smtp4.wtnet.de) (213.209.103.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:11:38 +0000 X-WT-Originating-IP: 84.46.106.252 Received: from f9.linux (pop8-761.catv.wtnet.de [84.46.106.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp4.wtnet.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6LNBG43031669 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:11:16 +0200 Message-ID: <4E28B212.5020105@wtnet.de> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:11:14 +0200 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OOo Trademark References: <4E251820.9020101@gmx.org> <4E25B629.6040508@oracle.com> <4E25E1A8.5050901@shanecurcuru.org> <4E277F29.4040601@gmx.org> <20110721111150.GB21823@ulungele.erack.de> <4E280E2E.5060502@wtnet.de> <3A877B86-76F0-4320-AC04-65A86FD7EF3D@webmink.com> <4E28AEC4.6060301@shanecurcuru.org> In-Reply-To: <4E28AEC4.6060301@shanecurcuru.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 07/22/2011 12:57 AM, schrieb Shane Curcuru: > Note that Tightrope has abandoned their US trademark application for > OPENOFFICE. Yay! > > http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=85298190 Great to know, thanks for the link. :-) Marcus > On 7/21/2011 2:14 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >> On 21 Jul 2011, at 06:31, Marcus (OOo) wrote: >> >>> Am 07/21/2011 01:11 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: >>>> Hi Peter, >>>> >>>> On Thursday, 2011-07-21 09:21:45 +0800, Peter Junge wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Once this is cooked, I'm eager for us to pick up the threads on >>>>>> trademark >>>>>> enforcement against "subscription fraud" abusers of the trademarks. >>>>> >>>>> This is indeed a big and painful issue that should somehow be >>>>> tackled. I think the I remember the former lead of the German OOo >>>>> Marketing Project had collected several hundreds of cases of >>>>> subscription fraud with OOo. >>>> >>>> About 2000 reported cases as of June 2010, see >>>> http://de.openoffice.org/abgezockt/ (all in German) >>> >>> Wow, what a frigthening number of cases. :-O >> >> And there are many more in other countries. Defending the >> OpenOffice.org trademark just against this nasty abuse is a full-time >> project. I would be be happy to participate in it once Apache has >> standing. >> >> Also, Shane& Andrew, do you know whether Oracle has objected to the >> trademark application by Tightrope Interactive that was reported in >> The Register[1]? It would be very sad to see that one fall through the >> cracks during the hand-over. >> >> S. >> >> >> >> [1] >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/29/oracle_no_comment_on_downed_openoffice_org_url/