Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A4954938 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 14:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96380 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2011 14:31:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96315 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2011 14:31:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96307 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2011 14:31:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:31:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kreisls@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:31:08 +0000 Received: by fxg7 with SMTP id 7so3790916fxg.7 for ; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 07:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g6GWFSH8YCAAbBkeRxfKmHMR51k93fWxkB1p5bPeUbo=; b=BrEB4f8rkPp+VfYZFPpnTIHeYnTlyDFu8qtnsxmjVWucr+yX+VrL52JFK1JIFjlPDA 7InBa74pSAmqYKsnawXLktLcSfuiDbA+byKMrR6AECr45tVfB2vjq7Ax7BWuQmToF1Ky FpQyFNwf/I+6ROEno3l4Pg6UJXmX/h2RLtkJg= Received: by 10.223.144.194 with SMTP id a2mr522183fav.138.1310221846647; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 07:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.23] (p578E86FD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.142.134.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm7916713fay.21.2011.07.09.07.30.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 07:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kls kls Message-ID: <4E186614.9010709@apache.org> Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 16:30:44 +0200 From: Ivo Hinkelmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org (was Re: Ooo blog) References: <4E182995.20203@btconnect.com> <30FF8418-62FE-4038-A17E-6146277E8FE2@Janik.cz> <4E18419F.90409@khmeros.info> In-Reply-To: <4E18419F.90409@khmeros.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09.07.2011 13:55, Javier Sola wrote: > Why does the name need to be changed? Is there any value in adding > "Apache" to the name? > > I really think that the name is one of the most important assets of > the project at this time. > [snip] +1 I would also prefer that we just called it "OpenOffice.org". This brand is known everywhere and this is not a fork but the moved "original" OOo project. Cheers, Ivo