Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:23:23 +0300
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Population of ooo-security
Message-ID: <20110729202323.GA986@daniel3.local>
References: <4E31D790.8050409@documentfoundation.org>
 <4E32AE10.7030004@gmx.com>
 <4E32C59C.5090601@documentfoundation.org>
 <CAP-ksojiEcnCi9+hkGg+eOiZXLB5rUA4m74a445Mi-sb9JiaJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E32CA9E.7020001@documentfoundation.org>
 <CAP-ksojHZ9S=yPaN3DAW=BdRrw-WEafm6SxLLn0hkeT9bS=EZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFWMYEGsKsesSDHpGQV_EWTsJUpTa6bp42wt8LVfcEKUo+ikqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <B81957EF-481F-4AD9-96E0-18C1AC253924@comcast.net>
 <CAFWMYEFFNLtkbFawgCFHJKwSoX1uhc1HdWSQJP4zdTC5E5jjhg@mail.gmail.com>
 <DB085D6D-F5BF-43B1-8C37-9134EA1D5877@Janik.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <DB085D6D-F5BF-43B1-8C37-9134EA1D5877@Janik.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Pavel Jan�k wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 19:55:04 +0200:
> 
> On Jul 29, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> 
> > PS: why o why would signing an iCLA be a requirement to be a project
> > security liaison ? it's like asking that any ambassador be naturalized
> > citizen of the country he is in post in.
> 
> Because this is how Apache works?
> 

-1.  "Because these are the rules" is an answer suitable for a dictatoracy.
The rules aren't arbitrary, there's a logic behind them.

For committers an ICLA is required to ensure ASF's and its downstream
consumers' rights in contributions.  "Would an ICLA be needed for
ooo-security@ subscribers" is a different question, and it deserves
an answer.


> I got that already. And I tend to agree with this. We don't want to be enemy project in ASF.
> -- 
> Pavel Jan�k
> 
> 
>