Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A00C64E18 for ; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 20:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33781 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2011 20:22:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33598 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2011 20:22:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33590 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2011 20:22:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:22:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 208.113.200.5 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of pescetti@openoffice.org) Received: from [208.113.200.5] (HELO homiemail-a79.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:21:54 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a79.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a79.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67297D4061; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [151.67.85.124]) (Authenticated sender: andrea@pescetti.it) by homiemail-a79.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7598F7D4059; Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org (was Re: Ooo blog) From: Andrea Pescetti To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4E186614.9010709@apache.org> References: <4E182995.20203@btconnect.com> <30FF8418-62FE-4038-A17E-6146277E8FE2@Janik.cz> <4E18419F.90409@khmeros.info> <4E186614.9010709@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:21:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1310242879.2145.11.camel@fedora> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ivo Hinkelmann wrote: > I would also prefer that we just called it "OpenOffice.org". This brand > is known everywhere and this is not a fork but the moved "original" OOo > project. Same for me. This Apache podling has many nice features, but its most distinctive ones are: - Participation of many Hamburg developers - Ownership of the OpenOffice.org trademark These elements of continuity can be very reassuring to users, and the project communication should take advantage of it. If there is the strict requirement of having "Apache" in the name, "Apache OpenOffice.org" would be the natural candidate, but it still sounds weaker than the well known "OpenOffice.org" brand. Regards, Andrea.