Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 768377F05 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98553 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2011 19:45:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98499 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2011 19:45:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98491 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jul 2011 19:45:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:45:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dennis.hamilton@acm.org designates 75.98.160.130 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.98.160.130] (HELO a2s15.a2hosting.com) (75.98.160.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:45:34 +0000 Received: from 63-226-210-225.tukw.qwest.net ([63.226.210.225] helo=Astraendo) by a2s15.a2hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhRqT-0004R4-G3 for ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:45:13 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Dennis E. Hamilton" To: References: <015d01cc4258$2e2fedb0$8a8fc910$@acm.org> <20110714191449.GA14912@daniel3.local> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Committers and Contributors and PPMC Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:45:17 -0700 Organization: NuovoDoc Message-ID: <017801cc425e$8f7bdc40$ae7394c0$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQEOJwncLMFMC8TZfdF7R29ifbEkAQDtrVFcAbsBUbuWUyPW4A== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s15.a2hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - acm.org My impression is that voting is done on the list with +1,0,-1 = tabulation. That is how ballots have happened on the PPMC and it is how = the ballots on the general@incubator are conducted. The only case I can foresee off hand that might lead to [VOTE], if a = [DISCUSS] does not demonstrate consensus, might be over the name of the = project, the deliverable, and the domains of web sites once = openoffice.org has transferred to Apache and we know the ASF policy, = legal, and trademark constraints that have to be honored. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: acolorado@gmail.com [mailto:acolorado@gmail.com] On Behalf Of = Alexandro Colorado Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 12:20 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton Subject: Re: Committers and Contributors and PPMC On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf = wrote: > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:59:37 -0700: > > It is my impression (based on no experience at all) that when issues > > come to a vote on the ooo-dev list, PPMC member votes are binding = and > > the votes of other project contributors and observers are not, > > although I am confident that non-binding votes are given careful > > attention. > > That's correct. Furthermore, voting on technical issues is the very > rare exception rather than the rule. (Read: almost never happens) > > We strongly prefer to operate by consensus. > Is this done through a rudimentary process of +1 on mailing lists or is there an app to perform quick polling campaings? --=20 *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Espa=C3=B1ol http://es.openoffice.org