From ooo-dev-return-1596-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Jul 4 21:28:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 238856108 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 21:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89981 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 21:28:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89804 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2011 21:28:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89796 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2011 21:28:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:28:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of simon@webmink.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-gw0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:28:10 +0000 Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so2233426gwb.6 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.195.68 with SMTP id o44mr7344335yhn.391.1309814869640; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.9.8.222] ([200.186.138.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a47sm4319425yhj.24.2011.07.04.14.27.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Releasing OOo 3.4 on the old infrastructure From: Simon Phipps In-Reply-To: <01ee01cc3a8d$87d0a760$9771f620$@acm.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:27:46 -0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <1308479011.2937.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1309710429.2926.17.camel@fedora> <20110704130652.GB7821@ulungele.erack.de> <982917.17079.qm@web161427.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <492117.42264.qm@web161425.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <01b201cc3a85$2ca2a620$85e7f260$@acm.org> <544A1DDA-2C73-4FC5-A441-47EBCB710096@webmink.com> <01ee01cc3a8d$87d0a760$9771f620$@acm.org> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) On 4 Jul 2011, at 18:01, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > If the Oracle grant (a license) applies to the code at a particular = snapshot in time, then I assume that changes to that code after that = might not be covered (however covered by the CLA to Oracle/Sun), and = certainly anything which involves additional files might not be covered. While Oracle has expressed general goodwill, their grant at present is = in the form of an explicit list enumerating what files are covered. We = almost certainly need to monitor a build of 3.4 to see if that list of = files includes everything necessary. Whatever repo we run that build on: * will include a mix of licensing until the grant from Oracle is = updated, * is open source so there are no restrictions on our actions * is not intended for full release so doesn't break any Apache rules As such it doesn't seem to matter much to my naive eyes whether we wait = for the SVN repo to be built, build from the existing Hg repo (assuming = we've sufficient access), or do it somewhere else. I expect I am wrong though, I'm getting used to that :-) S.