From ooo-dev-return-1870-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Jul 8 11:30:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 872FE6307 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65961 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 11:30:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65771 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 11:30:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65763 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2011 11:30:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:30:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Mathias_Bauer@gmx.net designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.23] (HELO mailout-de.gmx.net) (213.165.64.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:29:52 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jul 2011 11:29:32 -0000 Received: from e176048243.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO [192.168.1.250]) [85.176.48.243] by mail.gmx.net (mp067) with SMTP; 08 Jul 2011 13:29:32 +0200 X-Authenticated: #17242763 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/QOOcLqz3QAGDEjQr2DFiyr29gY+Qi2a+ENQsktT 3qV/sAksEnS+y4 Message-ID: <4E16EA18.9050302@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:29:28 +0200 From: Mathias Bauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OOO and LibreOffice. References: <010001cc3741$51c88740$f55995c0$@acm.org> <00d001cc380f$98fec4c0$cafc4e40$@acm.org> <1309664343.19050.3.camel@rigel> <1309666612.2224.4397.camel@linux-krcc.site> <4E14E6F1.8020700@oracle.com> <4E15A3E6.7040904@gmx.net> <4E15ED06.7000007@gmx.net> <4E16E2D4.1060003@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 08.07.2011 13:17, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Jul 8, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote: >> On 08.07.2011 12:50, Armin Le Grand wrote: >>> I just want to mention that with the variable cleanup in OOo I >>> had 1010 conflicting files on aw080 on the next resync, in >>> average with 4-5 conflicts due to the fact that I already had >>> changed the variables in the refactored code to something useful. >>> This took me nealry 1 1/2 weeks where not really something >>> productive could happen, just resynching and getting all compiled >>> an running again. >>> >>> So, please, when You do such changes, keep in mind that this will >>> produce a lot of work for people which You may not have on Your >>> radar... >> >> Good point. So it might make sense to integrate large cws before >> doing any janitory work on the code base. > > It might make even more sense to move to a development model with > much more frequent integrations than what we did with CWSs in the > past. But that's getting off topic for this thread (and should be > discussed once fresh development on the new repo actually takes > place). I assume that you know that I agree with you in that point. :-) Regards, Mathias