From ooo-dev-return-1640-apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jul 5 16:43:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 382164536 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93651 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2011 16:43:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93593 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2011 16:43:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93585 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2011 16:43:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:43:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown ipv4:200.91.200.0/24 (athena.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: from [98.139.91.236] (HELO nm29-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:43:27 +0000 Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm29.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jul 2011 16:43:07 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.59] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jul 2011 16:43:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1059.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Jul 2011 16:43:07 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 81255.61584.bm@omp1059.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 51717 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jul 2011 16:43:06 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1309884186; bh=jROwyAkkqFEDknm4n9jz1IfeKDyBgOyD30vSonGIFGM=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=K5+BHyoUfMwCtt8FMCcFHBJUzKeNIhL5RKK4CiZ1h0g5lZib42qlW2WLDMwnw/nnuxUiSLm8zsXYkNmfRorVz+AOecbCBVGGp/OvuXYLkGl3jEE1E7j+2V4vRuMz2HIiYHvxMTtzsiTi+VOd6TPvOgpiorp+LhI3B3t+d6dGBxA= X-YMail-OSG: X.1eGt4VM1mxQXP0.Ly33lhC6kMUab.10LKMOIOLQZ34cjF xqCeOmBfkIEIlu20nzP_aP8EHtHkrLsku.2HcOBuiAPrPeIUhJXD6M5.oRwu ypEbh9imE0iinm3CHRv.DXsbNxx5EgusAjmy2vySkMac8B1PSJ5htnPRsc7l TPSGIgjSnBTmnPBBBreawEXtX.owvYeYPhZaUVuGEkr5qQP.LfzIcvLBRCMv M9l85zRyl9eG9wZ8G16TRm7.hf9QF65nLx4sazW87jpG3HmTj2LQGaNdX1pL ZRW7.9bLgr6n4o2j0sJSwlx_K8GeVbmbpDEuHho0uAiKX3_EHdgchKNPubHS G5n.jYs3M0lXZYgXdZtDZNR5.KjMGpJJJwINOGy6yhUS1yViirC7iX2_1Itd dGhQI4KTIJlRmyGoYD.8PVapH0inPLhmiI5E5suktciYsPZpoKUA2GEcPBkN TRFk5IOY6ITNWUf0P.jT7RkkbZ.iEev_IiFWCqpSh1b4ImwNXVD5izAwxDaB 3MphMbs_4A9grWJwiOA-- Received: from [190.157.142.22] by web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:43:06 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.112.307740 Message-ID: <1309884186.41160.YahooMailClassic@web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:43:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Reply-To: giffunip@tutopia.com Subject: Re: Migration, Bugzilla to JIRA To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- On Tue, 7/5/11, Rob Weir wrote: ... > > I'd like to explore the technical feasibility of migrating > to JIRA. > +1 > I see this page here describing the migration from JIRA's > perspective: > > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/tour/bugzilla-importer.jsp > > This appears to require db admin credentials. > > Does anyone have experience doing this kind of migration? > I am sure infra@ has the experience. I can't find it in the archives but someone in the list offered to make available the bugzilla archive. We should probably just make an experimental conversion and keep it if things go well. > And from the project perspective, I assume we want to > migrate all issues, old, new, open closed, everything? > And we must preserve IDs. The priority is new open, but the most we can preserve the better. I would expect all the code in there is covered by the grant too, so we are probably getting a lot of code that was initially rejected but is part of some unnamed forks. Pedro.