On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> wrote:
> I just sent in a test email from my work email. Please do not divulge my employer. (Ah
these corporate rules ;-)
>
Message arrived, no moderation note.
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On Jul 29, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>> You're probably right. It is up to the list subscribers to know what to ignore
then.
>>
>> We haven't had anything from an unknown sender yet, so we can know for sure.
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d.s@daniel.shahaf.name]
>> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 13:42
>> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Operating ooo-security (was RE: Population of ooo-security)
>>
>> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 13:28:01 -0700:
>>> We are in a very fledgling situation here. Let's see if we can clear up a few
things.
>>>
>>> Here is my understanding of the situation as it exists at the moment.
>>>
>>> - Dennis
>>>
>>> 1. The ooo-security@i.a.o list is private and moderated. Anyone can
>>> send a message to the list. The three current moderators of the list
>>> share responsibility for allowing a post onto the list or not.
>>> Anyone can also attempt to subscribe to the list. Once the requester
>>> completes the e-mail verification ceremony, the request is submitted
>>> for approval by the moderators. In this case, the way the moderators
>>> decline is by doing nothing.
>>
>> I thought that security@ lists were moderated for subscription but not
>> for posting.
>>
>
>
|