incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Junge <>
Subject Re: (was Re: Ooo blog)
Date Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:24:49 GMT
On 09.07.2011 20:02, David McKay wrote:
> My preference has nothing to do with blogs, it is purely a naming and
> branding issue. Formally, was always written as
> by those who knew, but colloquially/informally it was
> always talked about as OpenOffice. I agree we need to maintain ties with
> the legacy and history of, but the removal of the .org
> isn't going to jeopardise that.

This was always a trademark issue, just two quick examples:
Siemens has a trademarked product called HiPath OpenOffice [1], there's 
also a IT service provider in the Netherlands who has registered Open 
Office [2] and AFAIK there are many more to consider in other countries. 
We had exactly the same discussion a million times, which came always to 
the conclusion we *must* use Please spare us the one 
million and first deja vu. Over the year we got used to it. The 
community that has landed on Apache's shores is the 

As to the differentiation of and Apache, I 
would propose to use the latter for the project and the community now, 
but keeping the former for the branding of the product.

Best regards,


> Dave.
> On 09/07/11 12:55, Javier Sola wrote:
>> Why does the name need to be changed? Is there any value in adding
>> "Apache" to the name?
>> I really think that the name is one of the most important assets of
>> the project at this time.
>> We have spent quite a lot of effort in the last few years promoting
>> the OpenOffice (or OpenOffice,org) name, to the point that it is part
>> of the approved IT policies of some countries.
>> I have worked to get OpenOffice into the textbooks of two countries...
>> and it would be a pain to explain to them now that Apache OpenOffice
>> or Apache Office will be installed instead, even if it is the same
>> thing... It was exactly the same problem as changing to LibreOffice,
>> the name is a key reason not to change.
>> If there is a technical problem with blogs... then it should be solved
>> technically, not by changing the name of the product.
>> Javier
>> Pavel Janík wrote:
>>>> Why? Out of the folk on the OOo forum who expressed an opinion to
>>>> me, no one liked it. It was a perpetual reminder that the product
>>>> couldn't be called what they really wanted it to be called:
>>>> OpenOffice. I greatly prefer Apache OpenOffice to Apache
>>> The product and the project WAS If we want to change
>>> it, then why not directly Apache Office?

View raw message