incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From BRM <bm_witn...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Apache CMS Workflow and a Key Question
Date Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:01:59 GMT
----- Original Message ----

> From: Marcus (OOo) <marcus.mail@wtnet.de>
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, July 18, 2011 12:59:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Apache CMS Workflow and a Key Question
> 
> Am 07/18/2011 06:31 PM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
> >
> >
> > --- On  Mon, 7/18/11, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.mail@wtnet.de>   wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >>>
> >>> So, all is not  necessarily lost - but it does depend
> >>> on whether you want to  reload the SVN repo.
> >>
> >> I don't know how you thought about  CVS but the respective
> >> repo is already on  SVN.
> >>
> >
> > I am confused. Apparently (I am a newcomer) OOo  has moved
> > from several VCSs:
> > CVS -->  SVN -->   Hg -->  SVN (Apache)
> >
> > In each conversion one necessarily  looses some information.
> > Have we lost significant history during any of  those conversions?
> >
> > Perhaps we can take a previous SVN (assumming  it exists) and
> > do the conversion progressively from  there?
> >
> > Just wondering though.. I am sure the people doing this  are
> > taking their time for a reason ;).
> 
> Please don't mix things  up. I'm talking about the SVN repo that has the 
> website stuff and not the  core source code of OOo.
> 
> Of course we want to keep the repo history of  the OOo source code. But 
> IMHO it's not necessary to keep itfor the website.  Of course we can do 
> this, too, if someone means it's important. But it would  be the stuff 
> from February, 23rd until today. The  older stuff is  already lost.
>

Okay. Understood. I think we got some confusion into this thread.

Ben


Mime
View raw message