Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 294A0722D for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8612 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 02:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8437 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2011 02:00:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8429 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2011 02:00:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rabastus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:00:23 +0000 Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so731868iwn.6 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:00:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vdWF7sScD8NJb5Xzb5oulEdYZhVwXAkfCMtpzKhIByk=; b=HQbgDumB2xbm8pITZOu5Db+/SPHxhZ2r62segAiXcqlClpfY4EbF2SzD4pwJT01il2 8FRzUbLsUK35FqR/XCA1uY6eqKMM3HWmeryLrtjKBPAanqlvZo8O/LzRP4qw14Zq1wpz CVlpk1OCePKOPO5QKMjPUeKRo0gSpRXm2kwrA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.225.70 with SMTP id ir6mr216391icb.494.1309312801550; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rabastus@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.213.71 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:00:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1309309035.2098.104.camel@jean-laptop15> References: <1309302355.2098.67.camel@jean-laptop15> <1309307301.2098.79.camel@jean-laptop15> <1309309035.2098.104.camel@jean-laptop15> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:00:01 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -YQXQlM1JJEpaUdPvKTxSKADkKc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Scope of Apache license: what needs to be covered? From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wr= ote: > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:44 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Jean Hollis Weber = wrote: >> > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 19:22 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> It might help to be explicit about what you want to do with the user >> >> guides. =C2=A0Are you: >> >> >> >> 1) Looking to have a link from the Apache OOo web site to the user gu= ides? >> >> >> >> 2) Having the publication form of the user guides hosted by the Apach= e >> >> OOo website? >> >> >> >> 3) Periodically contributing the user guides to Apache OOo for >> >> inclusion in a release? >> > >> > 1) and/or 2) Yes, if AOOo in interested in either of those options. Or >> > hosted (as ODT/PDF) on the wiki, with links to the wiki from the >> > website. We would be happy with any of those arrangements. >> > >> >> Did you see how Apache Subversion was handling its user guide? >> >> http://subversion.apache.org/ >> >> (see in the side panel on left) >> >> That might be a good model for how an external user guide project can >> relate to an Apache project. =C2=A0This looks more like option #1 above. > > > I think that is a good approach and I like it. > If you take that approach then I don't think there is any decision that we need to take now, at least not in the Apache project. But when we have an end-user facing web portal hosted by Apache (the future home of http://www.openoffice.org) then we'll want to have a discussion on how we link to your user guide. One other thing. I think the Apache trademark policy is also relevant here= : http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/ You probably will want to review that and see if you would need any approvals from Apache for the trademarks and/or logos that you use in the user guide. -Rob