Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF18D6350 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22694 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:00:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22662 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 11:00:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22654 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 11:00:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:00:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:00:50 +0000 Received: by vxd7 with SMTP id 7so1155310vxd.6 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:00:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Y5zArb8HFsdiu9cujjnTDAemIhjOfEVtq42emPCotmI=; b=oY4BWVCdyanwZKtVw0UoRvygY7h+XBX99cKRUm8xWAMwbN4VkNOsb62K73qGFfp76v Gr2v2+3ZEjT6WerTuD/hg5dMVadlMWlSnqQGuJqyUCL39UPpTUNz6MIcydHsLoiRJmiH k/Ynw6wycTEOEAMn0L7xWWcVsIWqat+LNUb5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Jr+MYKynxa0akeeuhFBDFHJ2hbEFq8U/8+5wVebqCq4RIpape9F7hb+LPxjCKyLH7n eNO+1fms6SWpNPH1boELzBqcOz9fw8UuH6XyqqU3giLwrW6c5kVrPfg4RWFw17a6tgwn QBJfKndZO2FwQlbfiAq33URtVwfG+61DPRxKU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.108.195 with SMTP id hm3mr1053009vdb.201.1308222029442; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:00:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.109.37 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:00:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DF9DF24.5070603@gmx-topmail.de> References: <4DF9BCA5.6040609@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> <4DF9D086.5050302@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> <4DF9DF24.5070603@gmx-topmail.de> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:00:29 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4_TrMbwtgHn_yM9lF5u8aAvOcBQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Teams and Leads (was: Proposed short term goals) From: Sam Ruby To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:47 AM, IngridvdM wrote: > > I am really in favor of going without anyone being named leader or manager > or any name that could create the impression that this person has more > rights than the others. Maybe we can choose 'contact' as a neutral > description in case something turns out to be needed? Or is there even a > more neutral word? The only 'contact' that people need for this project is ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org. If this list grows too large or too busy, then we can create additional 'contacts' in the form of more mailing lists. > Ingrid - Sam Ruby