Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F36256E36 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51335 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 13:58:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51269 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 13:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51257 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 13:58:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:58:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rabastus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:58:44 +0000 Received: by iwn19 with SMTP id 19so742184iwn.6 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:58:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zn456slRtWd4UWl/g4XTM5A7Bs4GAASXjIJJAXwMl1k=; b=x2Bf6FoMtPwARic/+eYrWLGRCc7yAgs1Iy65xKVS5r0fQiVbwRv26Va92nwDsMk6Xu O72e2RcZoViBOVToTuGtP87FCBOn/CWdePU/q3paXPwQZ+wUNgpQ4QarA58wWbBuQYOP s+tNoKQFkhUYrFGwA7ct3sEtpbPKJObP6+Zk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=r1kzSW+i43L77+bmxisUjSSVDTAlu1iJKcfmkKUxzoYTXKfB9UomXSjOopcJ88Q3Hb /5Ux47Lhce7oBh2aipgmQmy5FqV0fecpebH1aV1dVt6e2LVdz1SMwTyQGe0d1aPLpock KjMMmRqDOOCyvuIWh9KNKsH9oI+fAG0WGqdV8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.82.75 with SMTP id c11mr747451icl.92.1308751103571; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:58:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rabastus@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.213.71 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:58:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <74D7F70E-2BBD-470D-A478-56DBE201EE39@googlemail.com> References: <74D7F70E-2BBD-470D-A478-56DBE201EE39@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:58:23 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Gk5TDeQwpTbL5LUQzsOMD6p-3OU Message-ID: Subject: Re: So what about QA? From: Rob Weir To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OK. It is good that we have some experienced QA experts in the project. I wonder whether we could start putting together a QA plan the various milestones, especially what is needed for the 1st release and what is needed to migrate any QA systems from OpenOffice.org website. This planning work could go on in parallel to the development work that is currently going on. I've started a wiki page for the plan here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Wiki+Home I've outlined what I think will be required for the QA effort for our first build. But I am not an expert in OOo QA. Could the experts review this page and improve it? Ditto for: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Site-QA-Pl= an This is the plan for making sure that we migrate everything that QA needs from the OpenOffic.org website. Thanks, -Rob On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> We've had a lot of discussions from the dev, documentation, education, >> translation/localization perspectives. =C2=A0But I haven't really heard >> anything about testing. >> >> Could someone brief us on how QA was handled with OOo? =C2=A0Was it a >> community effort? =C2=A0Or was it done by Sun/Oracle? Was there any test >> automation? =C2=A0Or was it manual? =C2=A0Are there test documents avail= able? >> Are there unit/pre-integration tests? =C2=A0Or are they mainly tests of = the >> integrated product? > > While the QA team traditionally focused on tests of the integrated produc= t (and Maho Nakata already detailed that), there are also unit and smoke te= sts that are intended to be executed during build and when modifying code, = so are probably more considered part of the development rather than QA area= . > > -Stephan