Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Mathias_Bauer@gmx.net
 designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4E0B0931.7030201@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:14:57 +0200
From: Mathias Bauer <Mathias_Bauer@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Mnenhy/0.8.3
 OracleBeehiveExtension/1.0.0.2-OracleInternal
 ObetStats/CATCATCATCATCATCAFCATLAF_1292428138647-396660266 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Building a single Hg repository
References: <BANLkTinN1ee-dTM1kLQ_ugZmbukB__DXkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4E0AFE6E.9070702@gmx.net> <iuf0ib$42k$1@dough.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <iuf0ib$42k$1@dough.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 29.06.2011 12:59, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 29.06.2011 12:29, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>> As your local hg repo is just an intermediate step from where you export
>> to svn, you could pull all cws into one repository. The majority of the
>> different repositories (master or cws) consists of almost the same
>> changesets, so pulling into one repo will save a lot of disk space.
>>
>> This has been tried by several people and it worked for them.
>>
>> Someone has created a Mercurial extension that makes this process pretty
>> easy:
>>
>> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/BranchmirrorExtension
>>
>> As some of our cws are based on the DEV300 repo and some are based on
>> the OOo340 repo, you will need two repos or someone needs to copy the
>> cws from dev300 to ooo340 before.
>
> actually OOO340 should be sufficient, because it contains all changes
> from DEV300.
> why would copying to ooo340 (what do you mean by that? merging in
> OOO340?) be required?

You are right. As OOO340 contains everything from DEV300, there 
shouldn't be a problem.

Regards,
Mathias