Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C519B67EC for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90151 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 22:13:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90113 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2011 22:13:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90105 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2011 22:13:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:13:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcus.mail@wtnet.de designates 213.209.103.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.209.103.13] (HELO smtp3.wtnet.de) (213.209.103.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:13:07 +0000 X-WT-Originating-IP: 84.46.106.252 Received: from f9.linux (pop8-761.catv.wtnet.de [84.46.106.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp3.wtnet.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5OMCkd5019416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:12:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4E050BDE.4010602@wtnet.de> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:12:46 +0200 From: "Marcus (OOo)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Contributors versus Committers versus PMC members - AND USERS References: <00d301cc32b3$f5e4f760$e1aee620$@acm.org> <4E050863.7000106@the-martin-byrd.net> In-Reply-To: <4E050863.7000106@the-martin-byrd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org My experience is that the user has to a) subscribe to this mailing list and b) he doesn't know how to search for other things like in a FAQ. Of course, you think it's easy to subscribe and I can search in a mail archive. But for the *average* user these are unfamiliar things and IMHO they don't want to go this "complicated" way. That's a reason why the forums are so successful. So, +1 for keeping both. Marcus Am 06/24/2011 11:57 PM, schrieb Andy Brown: > Rob Weir wrote: > >> Does anyone see a difference other than the obvious difference of >> technology, between the OOo user list and the forums? Are they being >> used for different kinds of things? Or are they just different ways >> of doing the same things? >> >> -Rob >> > > There is a big difference from the users stand point. If you want to > see how "hot" this topic can get go to [1] and search for forum . As > an individual I prefer mailing list but I understand why some prefer > forums. For those that do not have high speed connections forums are a > bandwidth hog. The disadvantage to a mailing list is most of the time > you have to be subscribed or you may miss replies to your question and > makes it hard to follow up as needed. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/ > > For my part we need and can support both.