Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 martin.hollmichel@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted
 sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=u5dsgZuA5MHmpzj/d0SBb5gbL2criVrmK77EszVsYm8N8NF267pncQ4aChRs4VVDhB
         KSlNXLsBsWvH0kkRzV+4/gBVPKFJQ1TqiqgZKGBtFtmbM4wL02lyBzTspTJ/xyDb9lC4
         4pYc9m+zrOYylOkpqPEFUUmKS/rDf3+aEXCg8=
Message-ID: <4E01E106.8020103@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:33:10 +0200
From: Martin Hollmichel <martin.hollmichel@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2
 OracleBeehiveExtension/1.0.0.2-OracleInternal
 ObetStats/CATCATCAFCAFCATCAFCAFCAFLAFCATCAFCAFCAFCAFCAFCAFCAFCAFCAF_1290422906570-929276100
 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Some more strange files in the OOo code
References: <4E004760.5040902@gmx.net>
 <C49D0C70-2BDB-4FC4-A337-EC4E029DED03@webmink.com> <4E00A70A.8050305@gmx.net>
 <0724E7B4-0B11-44FD-859D-35DC500227B0@webmink.com> <4E00B247.5060009@gmx.net>
 <28541A25-F590-47D9-A58B-4841BE14C87F@googlemail.com>
 <BANLkTikMGrCEX-XE0bx5n1qBQ0ZpMo3oCg@mail.gmail.com> <4E01D0D8.4@gmx.net>
 <BANLkTikucgc=vikN-roUTRO8iQNYt1FmsQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikucgc=vikN-roUTRO8iQNYt1FmsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 06/22/2011 01:38 PM, Yuri Dario wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
>> That would be fine. It is not very urgent, as we won't build OOo on OS/2
>> soon. We can just leave that single file out. If you want to continue
>> development of the port, you can add the missing file.
> the file is not missing from tree, it only have the wrong license/owner in it.
yes, it seems that for the os/2 port some more files were added from
some sdk of other stuff, there all required to get moved to the external
stuff to get separated from the OOo tree. I'll be glad to help with this,
> thanks!
>
Martin