Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fpe.mlists@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.161.65 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=mrmn8YvUpY0R1UvLVtMeu5rxcW02om5UPyUDSUp1N25ACVC5u/9W/HfvRM5uaO9+C/
         pgAwmENGU0d52f3Ck6qva29yQnV9yv2q2iV0hTMTnPz56ODgqJQNtTzdgL7vYWv1RFeM
         EBwA3RbAN2e9kWlNOKRpTR1r6KzS5MD455lxY=
Message-ID: <4E01C210.6050004@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:21:04 +0200
From: Frank Peters <fpe.mlists@googlemail.com>
Reply-To: frank.thomas.peters@gmail.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2
 OracleBeehiveExtension/1.0.0.0-Champion Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Consequences of Working in Office Documents Here
References: <01f401cc3082$ecef01b0$c6cd0510$@acm.org>
	<20110622035818.GA25480@daniel3.local>
	<EEF769CA-91D0-4A6E-A362-8A08BAC5B6AB@comcast.net>
	<024d01cc30a2$90ad6660$b2083320$@acm.org>
	<BANLkTi=8NGhOQ57jHF9mNOFwrFGfoD5FqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E01B5A1.4050505@googlemail.com>
 <BANLkTikE4RdjKC6h4hRU+fTC7QBi9FMuYw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikE4RdjKC6h4hRU+fTC7QBi9FMuYw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>>> don't know where the answer is, other than "learn text". I hope that
>>> with examining what our true outputs are, we can focus on those, and
>>> find a path that works for the community.
>>
>>
>> What does that mean? What is a "true output" and how do "we"
>> differ from "the community"?
>
> Euh... just what I said: what are we producing? I tried to list some

Well I guess I had difficulties understanding why you would talk
about "true" output (vs what? perceived outputs?)

> concrete outputs. And "we" certainly means community. Not sure why you would
> think I define "we" any other way??

That was probably another misunderstanding from your wording.
My bad.

Thanks for the clarification
Frank