Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D03546DB0 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49446 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:17:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49405 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2011 17:17:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49397 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2011 17:17:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:17:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [148.87.113.121] (HELO rcsinet10.oracle.com) (148.87.113.121) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:17:34 +0000 Received: from rtcsinet21.oracle.com (rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p5EHHBSc015378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:17:12 GMT Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by rtcsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5EHHA0p025137 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:17:10 GMT Received: from abhmt017.oracle.com (abhmt017.oracle.com [141.146.116.26]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p5EHH42u001212 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:17:04 -0500 Received: from [130.35.70.39] (/130.35.70.39) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:17:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4DF79788.60309@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:16:56 -0700 From: Andrew Rist User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 OracleBeehiveExtension/1.0.0.2-OracleInternal ObetStats/CATUAF_1292349144501-582467479 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Wiki for the project References: <4DF6C223.9080508@gmx.ch> <4DF75A21.8080001@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4DF75A21.8080001@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4DF79799.003C:SCFSTAT5015188,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think this should be split into two phases. The first phase is getting our infrastructure for the new project going. This will allow us to coordinate our current activities. Then we plan and implement the migration of OOo content.(using the wiki) I think there will be a combination of archiving and migrating. That is something we can use the new wiki to discuss and plan. Andrew On 6/14/2011 5:54 AM, Frank Peters wrote: > What will happen to the existing wiki at > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org > which has quite some content (including > the main documentation pieces)? > > Would we maintain two wikis or merge > into Apache infrastructure? How can we > migrate existing content? > > I'd be eager to help with migration efforts (I > have admin rights on the wiki). > > Frank > >> +1 on the wiki request. >> >> Mentors,some advice, please, on how we make this happen? Is things >> something that PPMC members have rights to do? Or do we ask the >> IPMC? Or do >> we enter a request in the Infrastructure list? Or some >> Infrastructure issue >> tracking system? >> >> I'm volunteering to do the leg work (or is it finger work?) if >> someone can >> point me in the right direction. >> >> Also, what level of approval in the project is typically needed for >> routine >> requests like this? Is a +1 with no objections sufficient? Or do >> projects >> typically have a more elaborate voting procedure for this? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Rob >> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Raphael Bircher >> wrote: >> >>> Hi at all >>> >>> On http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html there is no >>> wiki emptry. We should use the incubator wiki to collect >>> informations, or we >>> get a seperate wiki for OOo? >>> >>> If we have to use the incubator wike, how we have to marke OOo >>> pages. It is >>> ok, if every site beginns with "OOo"? >>> >>> Greetings Raphael >>> -- >>> My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/ >>> >> >