Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andy@the-martin-byrd.net
 designates 204.16.46.7 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4DF788AA.3060704@the-martin-byrd.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:13:30 -0700
From: Andy Brown <andy@the-martin-byrd.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wiki for the project - wiki.services.openoffice.org provenance
References: <00a501cc2aac$ddabb120$99031360$@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <00a501cc2aac$ddabb120$99031360$@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> There are two pages that caught my attention immediately on visiting http://wiki.services.openoffice.org.
>
> There is this one:
> <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights>.
>
> And that leads to this interesting one:
> <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Authors_licensing_declaration>.
>
> None of those are what I would call permissive.
>

Hi Dennis,

My understanding, someone please correct me if I am wrong, those pages 
along with many others will have to be reworked to make the needed 
changes to reflect the new licensing.  That is what we are here for. :)

Andy