Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26664613F for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52641 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-ooo-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52609 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 16:45:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ooo-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52601 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 16:45:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dave2wave@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.64 as permitted sender) Received: from [76.96.30.64] (HELO qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:45:08 +0000 Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wgjs1g0070vp7WLA7gkl6B; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:44:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.9] ([67.180.51.144]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wgks1g01536gVt78Rgktmw; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:44:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Speaking of JIRA, Where's Ours? From: Dave Fisher In-Reply-To: <4DFA2C8C.7070903@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:44:45 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <02A766BC-1FD1-4D69-B2A5-236FA4FDFD61@comcast.net> References: <016901cc2bcd$f4a9a3b0$ddfceb10$@acm.org> <4DF9E311.50208@wtnet.de> <4DFA2C8C.7070903@gmx.net> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: > On 16.06.2011 16:45, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> Hi *, >>=20 >> (to moderators: I guess the list software used checks on Sender, not >> on =46rom - so if you need to review this message, please add the = sender >> address to a "allowed posters" lists for both dev and notifications >> please) >>=20 >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Marcus Lange = wrote: >>>=20 >>> I would prefer Bugzilla, too. We have already migrated recently to = this, so >>> transition would be much easier to bring it into Apache. And because = of >>> OOo's project size I would also like to see a new instance. >>=20 >> Not because of project size, but also for the sake of preserving the >> issue-numbers that are spread all over the place, last but not least >> in the code itself. >>=20 >> So whatever you choose, make sure that there is a way to get form >> #i1234# to the actual bug that corresponds to the id. >=20 > Yes, keeping issue ids is the most important thing. Which bug tracker = we use would be a second order priority for me. There seems to be consensus. (1) We must somehow preserve the old bugzilla ids. (2) There is no clear preference on Bugzilla over JIRA. I think that we need to ask the infrastructure team what they think = about the situation. Regards, Dave=