This is the second doubled set of email from you First email in this set had this in the headers: Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so337422iye.6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:19:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.239.10 with SMTP id ku10mr502544icb.477.1308147592984; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.228.3 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Second email had this: Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so361196iye.6 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.228.68 with SMTP id jd4mr464673icb.142.1308148254884; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.228.3 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:19:22 -0700 (PDT) It looks like there is some problems with an outbound filter of some kind in your infrastructure... Good luck. Regards, Dave On Jun 15, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> Anakia is "sooooo last decade" technology and has some requirements >> for everybody that wants to use it (eg. java :-) >> >> If the new CMS can be used, then I'd recommend going with that. It >> would be nice to get the community working with that today, as it >> should be a good tool to use in the long-term. (Anakia gets to be a >> pain for larger sites) >> >> The CMS is newer than that documentation, which may be why it "prefers" >> anakia. >> >> Please take a look, and I can help with any authz bits or other setup >> (just lemme know what I need to do). >> >> IOW, my +1 is for the CMS. If we find that the community doesn't like >> it, then we can make another choice for the long-term site. >> >> > With the CMS, would we also need to check in the generated site into SVN? > Or do we deploy "live" from the CMS? I assume this is the later, which would > be a lot simpler. > > Can you point me to a project that uses this for their project's website, > something that I can look at and potentially use a boilerplate for our site? > > Thanks! > > -Rob