incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Danese Cooper <>
Subject Re: Native Language vs l10n
Date Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:57:11 GMT

This proposal sounds workable to me.  Of course part of Manfred's point was
that there are also "core" l10n/i18n activities that would presumably now
happen at Apache within the core project.  IMHO, the language projects will
find Apache a much more open "upstream" than were Sun/Oracle.  Should make
things very nice once we actually get up and running.

OOo will be a different project to most everything else at Apache today
(including huge and already well-organized contributor communities who need
to continue to move forward as we re-rig things).  Hopefully someday we'll
have enough in place to offer services to some of them that would make sense
and more of them will find their way in.


On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir <> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Manfred A. Reiter <
> >wrote:
> 1) Strong existing language projects continue to operate independently,
> according to their own rules.
> 2) They ensure that their work is all done under Apache 2.0 license so it
> is
> usable by Apache OpenOffice as well as by LibreOffice
> 3) Language projects each appoint at least one member to join the Apache
> OpenOffice project as a liaison.
> -Rob

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message