1) volunteers are working on git hosting, but it's taking longer than
we expected. Additional volunteers are welcome- start by subscribiing
to infrastructure-dev@apache.org (a public list).
2) svn has improved its merging capabilities since you last ran ooo on it.
3) as I mentioned our svn infrastructure performs well. we even have a
transparent
mirror in europe to cut down on cross-atlantic latency.
----- Original Message ----
> From: Stephan Bergmann <stephan.bergmann.secondary@googlemail.com>
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 4:00:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Proposed short term goals
>
> What are the reasons? Is it "just" that there is no appropriate
> infrastructure in place, or is there some general rule that Apache projects
> must run on svn instead of something else?
>
> I'm asking because currently OOo runs on hg, and the short time we did run
> on svn (after cvs, before hg), things were not working really ideally for
> us.
>
> -Stephan
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> > Not at this time, no. FWIW our Subversion server is very responsive,
> > even for largish codebases (yay SSDs).
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: Damjan Jovanovic <damjan@apache.org>
> > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 3:37:53 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Proposed short term goals
> > >
> > > OO.o is a very large project, it might be overkill for Subversion. Is
> > > Git an option?
> > >
> > > Damjan
> >
>
|