incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de>
Subject Re: Naming of trunk and feature branches
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:29 GMT
Am 06/29/2011 03:39 PM, schrieb Michael Stahl:
> On 29.06.2011 15:03, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Branches can be named whatever we'd like. My own preference would be
>> to call this: /branches/3.4.x
>>
>> The "OOO" is awfully redundant, and the last digit ("0") doesn't make
>> sense since we would be releasing patches from the branch such as
>> 3.4.1. The "3.4.x" naming is used by many products, and it has worked
>> out very well.
>
> it wouldn't be a surprise to me if the reason for the "OOO340" name
> would be that it has to be exactly 3 letters followed by exactly 3
> digits, or otherwise some tooling breaks.
>
> for example, the 2.4.x CVS release branch was called OOH680 (what the
> heck does that mean?)

oh yes, right, I remember there was a special purpose for these naming 
schema. Let's see what Heiner will tell us. :-P

Marcus

Mime
View raw message