incubator-ooo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mathias Bauer <Mathias_Ba...@gmx.net>
Subject Re: Subversion history (was: Wiki, SVN, other resources)
Date Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:42:50 GMT
On 17.06.2011 10:01, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Mathias Bauer<Mathias_Bauer@gmx.net>wrote:
>
>> If we did it this way, my recommendation would be not to use the DEV300m103
>> milestone (that was used in the grant) but the most recent OOO340m1
>> milestone. This would force me to check my list for any new files, but that
>> isn't a big problem.
>>
>
> FYI, from looking at the changesets in OOO340 (tip rev c904c1944462) that
> are not in DEV300_m103 (rev 1bdfec44e7ce), it appears there are 144 new
> files (it "appears," because sometimes it is a bit hard to tell moved or
> split files from genuinely new ones):

(snip)

Most files are "business as usual", so I don't expect problems with them.

Maybe these two files need investigation:

> xmlsecurity/test_docs/CAs/Root_11/demoCA/newcerts/1022.pem
> xmlsecurity/test_docs/certs/end_certs/User_35_Root_11.crt

And we will probably remove parts of the new package stuff later, as it 
contains AES encryption based on nss code (IIRC).

> The other way around, DEV300 (tip rev 6b24005a31b8) past DEV300_m103 (why
> was such an old version chosen, anyway?) contains changesets not in OOO340
> (tip rev c904c1944462), but for new files, this appears to only amount to
> three harmless ones:
> offapi/com/sun/star/awt/grid/SelectionEventType.idl
> toolkit/qa/complex/toolkit/makefile.mk
> toolkit/qa/unoapi/makefile.mk

That's interesting. AFAIR OOO340m0 was branched from DEV300m106 - I 
wonder why something was integrated into DEV300 past the branch-off date.

Regards,
Mathias

Mime
View raw message