Frank Peters wrote:
> >What caught my eye was the statement that some material was under
> >special licensing and you'd have to notice that on an individual-page
> >basis.
>
> That is indeed the case and the licensing situation on the
> wiki has traditionally been awkward. But couldn't Oracle
> remedy this by (as copyright holder) relicensing the content
> under AL like done with the source?
>
Hi Frank,
um, I think the point made here is that certain content is *not*
copyright-shared with Oracle, and thus cannot be (easily)
relicensed?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
|