incubator-ooo-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From conflue...@apache.org
Subject [CONF] Apache OpenOffice Community > User Guides Revisted
Date Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:53:00 GMT
Space: Apache OpenOffice Community (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS)
Page: User Guides Revisted (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides+Revisted)
Comment: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides+Revisted?focusedCommentId=30151424#comment-30151424

Comment added by Kay Schenk:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Scenario 1: 
Not really an option but a default. This is what we have now and I have been greatly tempted
since the release of 3.4 to link to the draft docs for AOO 3.4 at the ODFAuthors site, but
got too busy to bring this up.
(Additioanlly, all documentation areas on the web server and wiki need realignment).

Scenario 2. (my preferred option)

Please elaborate on the "cons" of this option. For example, if work continues with ODFAuthors,
where are the docs really hosted? ODFAuthors is already a well-known site for the documents.
Can we continue to view this entity as the "official" producer/host of the User Guides and
just link/refer people to them? Are we concerned about full control? Why would there be distribution
problems.

Scenario 3: 
Nice, but, why start over when a successful process (ODFAuthors) is already in existence.
Additionally, the mechanism for development would need to be determined and maintained,etc.


Change your notification preferences: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/users/viewnotifications.action

Mime
View raw message