incubator-odf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating(RC7)
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:50:23 GMT
My sense is that the release votes are more technical than in other cases where it is a question
of support or desirability.

The idea is to have inspected the release and determine whether the requirements for a podling
release are satisfied.  I think it is a matter of finding no show-stopper around IP clearance,
the preparation of the package (notices, signatures, and such), or noticing that there is
some sort of problem building or running it.  

(I'm new to this too, so I can't be more certain than that.  I found no basis for a -1 but
am not competent to assert +1 in my limited understanding of the ODF Toolkit.  Hence my non-binding
and symbolic =0.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robweir@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 17:14
To: odf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating(RC7)

On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <luispo@gmail.com> wrote:
> procedural query: I just joined or subscribed to the list, at any
> rate, and am curious if I am entitled at this early stage to vote. I
> have of course read over (or scanned, more accurately) the archives.
> (Not much there, that I could find.)
>

Hi Louis,

Welcome to the list.  It is good to have another ODF warrior here.

Anyone can vote by responding to the [VOTE] thread.  Everyone's votes
are welcome, as expressions of support or concern, though in this
particular ballot only members of the Incubator PMC (the IPMC) have
binding votes.


-Rob


> thanks
> Louis
>
>
> On 3 January 2012 15:54, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 2011/12/27 Devin Han <devinhan@apache.org>:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
>>>> (incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
>>>> ODF Toolkit in Apache.
>>>>
>>>> This release candidate fixes the pom.xml file inconsistant issue found in
>>>> RC6. Thanks Yegor!
>>>>
>>>
>>> As promised, here are my Windows test results:
>>>
>>> mvn --version
>>>
>>> Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 12:31:09-0500)
>>> Maven home: C:\apache-maven-3.0.3\bin\..
>>> Java version: 1.6.0_16, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_16\jre
>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>>> OS name: "windows xp", version: "5.1", arch: "x86", family: "windows"
>>>
>>>
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>>> [INFO]
>>> [INFO] Apache ODF Toolkit ................................ SUCCESS [53.860s]
>>> [INFO] ODF Custom Javadoc Taglets ........................ SUCCESS [7:19.718s]
>>> [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Parent POM ... SUCCESS [0.250s]
>>> [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Library ...... SUCCESS [1:07.954s]
>>> [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Maven2 Plugin  SUCCESS [31.328s]
>>> [INFO] ODFDOM ............................................ SUCCESS [16:23.890s]
>>> [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner ................................... SUCCESS [7.953s]
>>> [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner Ant Task .......................... SUCCESS [4.047s]
>>> [INFO] ODF Validator ..................................... SUCCESS [1:23.063s]
>>> [INFO] Simple Java API for ODF (Simple ODF) .............. SUCCESS [4:21.156s]
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> [INFO] Total time: 32:19.453s
>>> [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jan 03 15:10:21 EST 2012
>>> [INFO] Final Memory: 28M/108M
>>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> And for completeness I've also repeated with Java 5.
>>
>> mvn --version
>>
>> Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 12:31:09-0500)
>> Maven home: C:\apache-maven-3.0.3\bin\..
>> Java version: 1.5.0_22, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.5.0_22\jre
>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
>> OS name: "windows xp", version: "5.1", arch: "x86", family: "windows"
>>
>>
>> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>> [INFO]
>> [INFO] Apache ODF Toolkit ................................ SUCCESS [51.797s]
>> [INFO] ODF Custom Javadoc Taglets ........................ SUCCESS [45.531s]
>> [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Parent POM ... SUCCESS [0.281s]
>> [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Library ...... SUCCESS [55.922s]
>> [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Maven2 Plugin  SUCCESS [37.453s]
>> [INFO] ODFDOM ............................................ SUCCESS [21:39.813s]
>> [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner ................................... SUCCESS [12.719s]
>> [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner Ant Task .......................... SUCCESS [12.859s]
>> [INFO] ODF Validator ..................................... SUCCESS [1:44.188s]
>> [INFO] Simple Java API for ODF (Simple ODF) .............. SUCCESS [5:18.156s]
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 32:28.000s
>> [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jan 03 15:52:20 EST 2012
>> [INFO] Final Memory: 28M/84M
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Note that I did need to make one change to ODFDOM's pom.xml to get
>>> around an OutOfMemory exception running one of the JUnit tests:
>>>
>>> I added this to the SureFire <configuration>
>>>
>>> <argLine>-Xmx512m</argLine>
>>>
>>> (Note that setting MAVEN-OPTS environment variable is not enough,
>>> since that is not passed on to Junit)
>>>
>>> Since no one else has run into this, and these flags are non-standard,
>>> I'm not sure whether we want them in the pom at all.  But we will want
>>> to mention this on the website, in case anyone else runs into it.


Mime
View raw message