incubator-odf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating-rc3
Date Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:59:32 GMT
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Devin Han <devinhan@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Yegor,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. I will try to fix these issues tomorrow. At the
> same time, let's waiting for the feedback from Ruby.
> BTW: I have fixed the issues and submitted which pointed out by Nick.
> Anyone who interested in it, please help me review it.
>

I can take a look at the Java 5 issue.

-Rob

> 2011/12/14 Yegor Kozlov <yegor.kozlov@dinom.ru>
>
>> Davin,
>>
>> Sorry for my belated feedback. I have some questions:
>>
>> (1) The required version of Java should be stated more clearly:
>> ODFTollkit requires JDK 1.6+.
>>
>> The "Getting Started" section of README.txt says "The ODF Toolkit is
>> based on Java 5" but this is too broad.  I had no luck compiling the
>> project under JDK 1.5.22.
>>
>>
>> (2) How are you going to release the Maven artifacts?
>>
>> Ideally, you stage the release for a vote on the ASF staging repo:
>> http://repository.apache.org. This is the recommended way to go for
>> Maven-based projects, see
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
>>
>> (3) The build process talks too much. I see hundreds of messages
>> starting with INFO and WARNING: they seem to come from
>> java.util.logging.* which redirects everything to stdout if no loggers
>> are defined. This should be easy to correct by placing a
>> logging.properties file in the classpath.
>>
>> I would like to see (1) corrected. (2) and (3) are desirable but if it
>> is hard I'm OK to wait until the next release.
>>
>>
>> Yegor
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Devin Han <devinhan@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Thanks again!
>> >
>> > Hi everybody, we are continuing collect feedback for RC3 before RC4 is
>> > ready. So, please keep free give your comments. Then I can update them in
>> > RC4 ASAP.
>> >
>> > Let's work together to make the first release born earlier ;)
>> >
>> > 2011/12/13 Nick Burch <nick.burch@alfresco.com>
>> >
>> >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Ideally we should have MD5 and SHA1 hashes for all of these files
>> >>>> (currently missing) and GPG signatures (only available for the -src).
>> Any
>> >>>> chance you could upload these too? (These could be added now, it
>> wouldn't
>> >>>> need a re-vote, but they should be added before release)
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  These files have been generated on my machine, just need submitted.
>> It's
>> >>> easy.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Great. They're normally included with the artifacts being voted on, as
>> >> that's one of the checks people typically do. One to add to the release
>> >> documentation :)
>> >>
>> >> Nick
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Devin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -Devin

Mime
View raw message