incubator-odf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Devin Han <devin...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating-rc3
Date Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:05:20 GMT
Hi Yegor,

I created a JIRA ticket[1] for releasing Maven artifacts.
Not sure the admin has enough time to deal with it because of Christmas
Day. So, the RC6 will not stage the release for a vote on the ASF staging
repo.

[1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4249

2011/12/14 Yegor Kozlov <yegor.kozlov@dinom.ru>

> Davin,
>
> Sorry for my belated feedback. I have some questions:
>
> (1) The required version of Java should be stated more clearly:
> ODFTollkit requires JDK 1.6+.
>
> The "Getting Started" section of README.txt says "The ODF Toolkit is
> based on Java 5" but this is too broad.  I had no luck compiling the
> project under JDK 1.5.22.
>
>
> (2) How are you going to release the Maven artifacts?
>
> Ideally, you stage the release for a vote on the ASF staging repo:
> http://repository.apache.org. This is the recommended way to go for
> Maven-based projects, see
> http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html
>
> (3) The build process talks too much. I see hundreds of messages
> starting with INFO and WARNING: they seem to come from
> java.util.logging.* which redirects everything to stdout if no loggers
> are defined. This should be easy to correct by placing a
> logging.properties file in the classpath.
>
> I would like to see (1) corrected. (2) and (3) are desirable but if it
> is hard I'm OK to wait until the next release.
>
>
> Yegor
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Devin Han <devinhan@apache.org> wrote:
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > Hi everybody, we are continuing collect feedback for RC3 before RC4 is
> > ready. So, please keep free give your comments. Then I can update them in
> > RC4 ASAP.
> >
> > Let's work together to make the first release born earlier ;)
> >
> > 2011/12/13 Nick Burch <nick.burch@alfresco.com>
> >
> >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Devin Han wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ideally we should have MD5 and SHA1 hashes for all of these files
> >>>> (currently missing) and GPG signatures (only available for the -src).
> Any
> >>>> chance you could upload these too? (These could be added now, it
> wouldn't
> >>>> need a re-vote, but they should be added before release)
> >>>>
> >>>>  These files have been generated on my machine, just need submitted.
> It's
> >>> easy.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Great. They're normally included with the artifacts being voted on, as
> >> that's one of the checks people typically do. One to add to the release
> >> documentation :)
> >>
> >> Nick
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Devin
>



-- 
-Devin

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message