From odf-dev-return-408-apmail-incubator-odf-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Mon Nov 28 03:00:08 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-odf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-odf-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 507529BF2 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52839 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2011 03:00:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-odf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52783 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2011 03:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact odf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: odf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list odf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52769 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2011 03:00:06 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:00:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username robweir, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 03:00:06 +0000 Received: by vcbfo13 with SMTP id fo13so1496601vcb.6 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:00:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.72.227 with SMTP id g3mr41954169vdv.10.1322449204868; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.218.139 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:00:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4ECCF005.6010607@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] odftoolkit-0.5-incubating-rc1 is ready From: Rob Weir To: odf-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Devin Han wrote: > Hi all, > > I will terminate this discussion 24 hours later. =C2=A0Is there anything = more > feedback for RC1? > I think I found another issue. Remember the discussion we had about what went in NOTICE and what went in LICENSE file? I said LICENSE should only contain the Apache license and everything else should go in NOTICE. But I just read this JIRA issue from legal-discuss: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-62 I think I was wrong before. The full licenses for the code we ship should go into LICENSE. So Apache as well as other licenses. NOTICE then has any "required third-party notices" and "copyright notices moved from source files submitted to the ASF". The JIRA issue points to the Apache server as a good example: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE -Rob > All of the reasonable suggestions will be included in RC2 and we will sta= rt > a formal vote for it in this week. > > 2011/11/25 Devin Han > >> Thank you for point it out, will update in RC2. >> >> >> 2011/11/23 Svante Schubert >> >>> Hi Devin, >>> >>> the RC1 looks good to me. >>> >>> Two minor remarks: >>> 1) =C2=A0if you use Maven 3, there is warning that in the pom.xml of th= e >>> Simple API the maven-assemply-plugin in line 390 is duplicated. >>> I removed the following >>> >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0maven-assembly-plugin >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0single >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0package >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0single >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 >>> >>> and made a "mvn clean install" and the created artifacts are the same, >>> but the warning was gone. >>> >>> 2) And minor typo result to a JavaDoc warning in >>> trunk/generator/schema2template/src/main/javadoc/overview.html >>> >>> where the '@' of '@odf.attribute' have to be masked. >>> Line 245 will be changed from >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * see {@odf.attribute ${attribute}} >>> to >>> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * see {@odf.attribute ${attribute}} >>> >>> Looking forward to the RC1, >>> Svante >>> >>> Am 22.11.2011 03:27, schrieb Devin Han: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > After learning Apache release policy[1], I prepared a candidate relea= se >>> on >>> > people.apache.org. >>> > First time do this work, so maybe exist omission or misunderstand, >>> please >>> > examine it and give your comments. >>> > If this candidate is passed, is the technical work for the first rele= ase >>> > ready? >>> > >>> > The candidate for the ODF Toolkit 0.5-incubating-rc1 release is >>> available >>> > at: >>> > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~devinhan/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.5-in= cubating/rc1 >>> > >>> > SVN Tag: >>> > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc1/ >>> > >>> > Change Notes: >>> > >>> > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/0.5-incubating-rc1/= CHANGES.txt >>> > >>> > --------------------------------- >>> > [1]http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -Devin >> > > > > -- > -Devin >