incubator-nmaven-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Evan Worley" <evanwor...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Graduation?
Date Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:27:21 GMT
This may be on hold,
http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/06/Open-Source-Violations

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Evan Worley <evanworley@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll volunteer for the sandcastle plugin, just put the whip down.
>
> -Evan
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Shane Isbell <shane.isbell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It sounds as though we need to start getting people off of 0.14 and this
>> means moving the Visual Studio work into trunk. I checked Sandcastle and
>> it
>> looks as though Microsoft finally put it under open-source, so that's one
>> area we can tackle for API doc generation. Any volunteers for  Sandcastle
>> plugin?
>>
>> We also have toolchains as of Maven 2.0.9. I added the NMaven support for
>> toolchains into the trunk, but there still is a fair amount we need to do
>> to
>> fully leverage it.  I've got some Maven related work and then am scheduled
>> for the .NET support for Nexus. After that, I'll be jumping into NMaven a
>> lot more. I think Evan is doing likewise, after he does his insane San
>> Francisco to LA bicycle ride next month (assuming he survives). So next
>> month, I expect we will have a lot more activity and start trying to build
>> the community and hopefully get in more committers. I know a lot of people
>> have submitted patches. Thanks for that. We will get it all sorted out.
>>
>> Shane
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, <caulene@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Evan,
>> >
>> > We definitely require full IDE integration for Visual Studio, as well as
>> > solution generation, pom generation from an existing solution file, and
>> > support for signed assemblies.?Generation of the XML docs is another
>> feature
>> > we'd love to see.?
>> > The developer community that I'm trying to support doesn't want to leave
>> > the IDE if at all possible, but we would love to pull them into the
>> > Maven-based environment that we currently use for Java builds.
>> >
>> > Shane - thanks for the update.? Keep that whip cracking! ;-)
>> >
>> > -- Caulene
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Shane Isbell <shane.isbell@gmail.com>
>> > To: nmaven-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 2:45 pm
>> > Subject: Re: Graduation?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > We are getting there. We have a release under our belt. We just need to
>> > prove that we have a healthy, sustainable developer community before we
>> > can
>> > graduate. Cracks whip over Evan's back ;)
>> >
>> > Shane
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Evan Worley <evanworley@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Caulene,
>> > >
>> > > It would be helpful to understand how your company plans to use
>> NMaven.
>> > > E.g. compile, test, package, etc.  Is there missing functionality that
>> > you
>> > > would require, such as IDE integration or solution file generation?
>> > >
>> > > (Note: I'm letting Shane handle the graduation question :) )
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for the feedback,
>> > > Evan
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, <caulene@aol.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Shane,
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm trying to implement NMaven within my company, and there are
>> > concerns
>> > > > that NMaven is still an incubator project.? What are the remaining
>> > > barriers
>> > > > for graduation from the incubator, and is there an estimated
>> > timeline??
>> > > How
>> > > > can we help?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Caulene
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message